<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<p>It's up to you. You can change it now if you have time, or we can
do it once we need to update jarsigner tests.<br>
</p>
<p>Artem<br>
</p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 01/20/2017 12:23 PM, Weijun Wang
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:1b0d6cdf-f5df-9ff2-154d-39249c517421@oracle.com"
type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite" style="color: #000000;">
<blockquote type="cite" style="color: #000000;">Also, I am
feeling that the jarsigner-related calls are quite
<br>
complicated. I suggest we use the same method for signing and
<br>
verifying and ask the user to provide all arguments in their
order. So
<br>
instead of calling
<br>
<br>
SecurityTools.jarsigner("x.jar", "alias", "...");
<br>
<br>
we just call
<br>
<br>
SecurityTools.jarsigner("... x.jar alias");
<br>
</blockquote>
This looks better to me as well.
<br>
<br>
I am fine with current webrevs.
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
A little confused. Do you think the current webrev is fine or is
it better to rewrite jarsigner()?
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>