<div dir="ltr">Hi Sean,<div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 5:07 PM, Sean Mullan <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sean.mullan@oracle.com" target="_blank">sean.mullan@oracle.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On 3/27/17 10:56 AM, Thomas Stüfe wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Hi Sean,<br>
<br>
thank you!<br>
<br>
Is it planned to fix 8054380? I see it is still open, but the assignee<br>
(Jason Uh) is marked as inactive and the issue is dormant since creation.<br>
</blockquote>
<br></span>
Not for JDK 9 since it is not critical. Note that this is only an issue when creating certificates with keytool and not when validating certificates. You could try using another tool to create certificates.<br>
<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>thanks for the info. So, basically, there is no particular reason I'm too blind to see not to fix the parser to accept hostnames with leading numbers, e.g., just lack of time/resources? I am asking because then we could fix it in our product downstream and maybe contribute the fix to upstream.</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks, Thomas</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
--Sean<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">
<br>
..Thomas<br>
<br>
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 4:42 PM, Sean Mullan <<a href="mailto:sean.mullan@oracle.com" target="_blank">sean.mullan@oracle.com</a><br></span><span class="">
<mailto:<a href="mailto:sean.mullan@oracle.com" target="_blank">sean.mullan@oracle.com</a><wbr>>> wrote:<br>
<br>
Good catch, I actually closed it as a duplicate but marked it as a<br>
duplicate of the wrong bug, it should have been<br>
<a href="https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8054380" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/<wbr>browse/JDK-8054380</a><br>
<<a href="https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8054380" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://bugs.openjdk.java.net<wbr>/browse/JDK-8054380</a>><br>
<br>
I fixed it so 8054380 is now the duplicate.<br>
<br>
--Sean<br>
<br>
<br>
On 3/27/17 9:26 AM, Thomas Stüfe wrote:<br>
<br>
Hi all,<br>
<br>
just a question, I hope this is the correct mailing list.<br>
<br>
There is <a href="https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8016345" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/<wbr>browse/JDK-8016345</a><br></span>
<<a href="https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8016345" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://bugs.openjdk.java.net<wbr>/browse/JDK-8016345</a>>, which is<span class=""><br>
about DNSName not accepting host names with leading numbers,<br>
which is<br>
valid according to <a href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1123" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://tools.ietf.org/html/rf<wbr>c1123</a><br></span>
<<a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tools.ietf.org_html_rfc1123&d=DwMFaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PQcxBKCX5YTpkKY057SbK10&r=wLZjDoZBdVMUe0-SnmtSgQUVl_gHmb_3aP58rurBKYA&m=DIIlALFx4DAHzx8FoLMhTQreVvtYOfMOHKfC_BltFn0&s=P6InJ7Ev_MpscdwaQI48sF2uMdTwbt124szmBQY03zE&e=" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://urldefense.proofpoint<wbr>.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tools.<wbr>ietf.org_html_rfc1123&d=<wbr>DwMFaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8P<wbr>QcxBKCX5YTpkKY057SbK10&r=wLZjD<wbr>oZBdVMUe0-SnmtSgQUVl_gHmb_<wbr>3aP58rurBKYA&m=DIIlALFx4DAHzx8<wbr>FoLMhTQreVvtYOfMOHKfC_BltFn0&<wbr>s=P6InJ7Ev_MpscdwaQI48sF2uMdTw<wbr>bt124szmBQY03zE&e=</a>><span class=""><br>
(Section 2.1).<br>
<br>
This bug was marked as a duplicate<br>
of <a href="https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8007706" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/<wbr>browse/JDK-8007706</a><br></span>
<<a href="https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8007706" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://bugs.openjdk.java.net<wbr>/browse/JDK-8007706</a>>, which I do not<span class=""><br>
understand - what do these errors have in common?<br>
<br>
I try to understand why JDK-8016345 was marked as will-not-fix. Are<br>
there any reasons to not fix the parser in DNSName.java (because<br>
the fix<br>
itself looks trivial)?<br>
<br>
Thank you, and Kind Regards, Thomas<br>
<br>
<br>
</span></blockquote>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div>