<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<p><br>
</p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 5/3/17 7:49 PM, Martin Buchholz
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CA+kOe08sVCWwR_khoX7NLEbeYQPw37oqrSDt4XgP8nsuwVfWdA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://w3.org">w3.org</a> doc seems to suggest we should
only be defining table styles with borders.</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.w3.org/TR/html5/tabular-data.html#attr-table-border">https://www.w3.org/TR/html5/tabular-data.html#attr-table-border</a><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra">"""Tables should not be used as layout
aids. """</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra">"""User agents, especially those that do
table analysis on arbitrary content, are encouraged to find
heuristics to determine which tables actually contain data and
which are merely being used for layout. """</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Understood. The patch as provided already changes some tables with
`summary="layout"` into definition lists. There are additional
candidates that would be candidates for such a change at some point.<br>
<br>
-- Jon<br>
</body>
</html>