<span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">Hi Sean,</span>
<br>
<br><tt><span style=" font-size:10pt">Sean Mullan <sean.mullan@oracle.com>
wrote on 05/04/2019 14:48:14:<br>
<br>
> From: Sean Mullan <sean.mullan@oracle.com></span></tt>
<br><tt><span style=" font-size:10pt">> To: Adam Farley8 <adam.farley@uk.ibm.com>,
security-dev@openjdk.java.net</span></tt>
<br><tt><span style=" font-size:10pt">> Date: 05/04/2019 14:47</span></tt>
<br><tt><span style=" font-size:10pt">> Subject: Re: RFR: JDK-8221990:
JDK11 Backport for "Program fails <br>
> when using JDK addressed by UNC path and using Security Manager"</span></tt>
<br><tt><span style=" font-size:10pt">> <br>
> On 4/4/19 12:03 PM, Adam Farley8 wrote:<br>
> > Hi All,<br>
> > <br>
> > It's been pointed out that the issue in 8218618 affects JDK11
as well.<br>
> > <br>
> > Is there any concern over backporting the fix?<br>
> <br>
> No, if it is a straight backport and you haven't changed the fix,
it <br>
> should be safe.<br>
> <br>
> --Sean</span></tt>
<br>
<br><tt><span style=" font-size:10pt">It is a straight backport of the
change, however the file the change</span></tt>
<br><tt><span style=" font-size:10pt">is being applied to differs slightly
between 11 and 12.</span></tt>
<br>
<br><tt><span style=" font-size:10pt">Not in a way that seems to affect
us today, but still worth mentioning.</span></tt>
<br>
<br><tt><span style=" font-size:10pt">Would you mind sponsoring this change?</span></tt>
<br>
<br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">Best Regards<br>
<br>
Adam Farley <br>
IBM Runtimes</span>
<br><tt><span style=" font-size:10pt"><br>
> <br>
> > <br>
> > Reviews and thoughts are appreciated.<br>
> > <br>
> > Bug: </span></tt><a href=https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?><tt><span style=" font-size:10pt">https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?</span></tt></a><tt><span style=" font-size:10pt"><br>
> u=https-3A__bugs.openjdk.java.net_browse_JDK-2D8221990&d=DwIC-<br>
> g&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=P5m8KWUXJf-<br>
> CeVJc0hDGD9AQ2LkcXDC0PMV9ntVw5Ho&m=1Bn_F993CxYkTmg_LTUMVQMWbcQpksz5QHcK6LWGDKQ&s=2_MaBtbGJHgTTf6Ctq_PXYtO6WIihcWl2Mcto9npoMU&e=<br>
> > <br>
> > Webrev: _https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?<br>
> u=http-3A__cr.openjdk.java.net_-7Eafarley_8221990_webrev_-5F&d=DwIC-<br>
> g&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=P5m8KWUXJf-<br>
> CeVJc0hDGD9AQ2LkcXDC0PMV9ntVw5Ho&m=1Bn_F993CxYkTmg_LTUMVQMWbcQpksz5QHcK6LWGDKQ&s=aFGLrsdqioi9MOwsHNF7HEDi0Mn0pn59LmwJE3WZWDs&e=<br>
> > <br>
> > Note: The jtreg tests for PolicyFile have been executed, and
the <br>
> > pass/fail rate is the same before and after the fix.<br>
> > <br>
> > Best Regards<br>
> > <br>
> > Adam Farley<br>
> > IBM Runtimes<br>
> > <br>
> > Unless stated otherwise above:<br>
> > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales
with number <br>
> > 741598.<br>
> > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire
PO6 3AU<br>
> <br>
</span></tt><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif"><br>
Unless stated otherwise above:<br>
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598. <br>
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU<br>
</span>