code review request for JVM/TI CompiledMethodLoad event extension (6580131)

Kelly O'Hair Kelly.Ohair at Sun.COM
Mon Jan 11 13:12:06 PST 2010


The makefile changes look fine, and thanks for fixing my
spelling errors in the tests. ;^)

The new demo looks good too.

-kto


Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
> Thanks for the review!  I did a merge with HSX-17 this AM and
> that went very smoothly so I'm testing those bits right now.
> 
> I'm hoping to hear from Vasanth today, but he doesn't appear
> to have an OpenJDK id so I can't list him as a reviewer; I
> have listed him as a contributor.
> 
> I'm also hoping to hear from Kelly since my Makefile tweaks
> were in stuff he knows...
> 
> Dan
> 
> 
> Tom Rodriguez wrote:
>> This looks good to me.  Thanks for your thorough work on this.
>>
>> tom
>>
>> On Jan 11, 2010, at 11:28 AM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
>>
>>   
>>> Second call for this code review request.
>>>
>>> Dan
>>>
>>>
>>> Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
>>>     
>>>> Greetings,
>>>>
>>>> The folks at AMD Labs have been kind enough to provide an
>>>> extension to the JVM/TI CompileMethodLoad event in order
>>>> to provide additional information about in-lining. This
>>>> extension uses the existing (but previously unused)
>>>> compile_info paramter:
>>>>
>>>> http://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/platform/jvmti/jvmti.html#CompiledMethodLoad 
>>>>
>>>> Vasanth and company provided the HotSpot code changes and
>>>> the original demo program. I just did the Makefile changes
>>>> to export the new jvmticmlr.h file in the HotSpot repo and
>>>> the integration of the demo program into JAVA_HOME/demo/jvmti
>>>> in the JDK repo.
>>>>
>>>> Here is the webrev for the OpenJDK6 version of the changes:
>>>>
>>>>   http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dcubed/6580131-webrev/0/
>>>>
>>>> The OpenJDK7 version of these changes are not expected to be
>>>> very different from this version.
>>>>
>>>> For the Sun folks, the CCC request for adding the jvmticmlr.h
>>>> is almost final. I'm waiting for the VM-SQE team to agree that
>>>> the latest version addresses their review concerns, but I
>>>> think the St Petersburg team is on holiday at the moment.
>>>>
>>>> Any reviews are appreciated.
>>>>
>>>> Dan
>>>>
>>>>       
>>
>>   


More information about the serviceability-dev mailing list