SA and JDK ( was Re: JDK8 Preliminary Repository Layout)

[Daniel D. Daugherty]

On 3/31/2011 7:55 PM, David Holmes wrote:
> Daniel D. Daugherty said the following on 04/01/11 11:27:
>> On 3/31/2011 7:10 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>> If this looks ok, it needs a bug ID and then pushing to JPRT by some
>>> friendly Oracle HotSpot developer :-).
>>>   
>>
>> Actually, I think we can use the following bug ID:
>>
>>    7010849 5/5 Extraneous javac source/target options when building 
>> sa-jdi
>>
>> if David H doesn't mind it being used for this push.
>
> No objections from me. We can just update the description or eval to 
> clarify that we took the opportunity to upgrade to 1.6 support.

I made myself RE of 7010849 and updated the evaluation.


>
>> I'll look at the webrev in the morning when my brain is less fried
>> and I'll take care of the testing and pushing...
>
> I just looked at the webrev and it all looks good to me. Had to think 
> a little about some of the varargs changes, but all seems ok. :)
Thumbs up from me also. The only change I'll make is to
update the copyright years in the touched files.

I'll get a repo setup, apply the patch and do some quick
sanity testing. If all goes well, then I should be able to
push this changeset today.

Dan


>
> Cheers,
> David