code review for 7067811: Update demo/sample code to state it should not be used for production

[Nils Loodin]

Ah, you're right, i forgot the samples directory. And as for the text 
being in each source file, that's how I undestood the requirement from 
Aurelio after some email conversation.  Looping him in and he might shed 
some light on it.

As I understood

On 08/11/2011 05:58 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
> Nils Loodin wrote:
>> Added a comment in each demo source file stating that the code below 
>> is unfit for production.
>> Made a separate comment blog from the copyright one to make it stand 
>> out more and be more warning-like :)
>>
>>
>>
>> /Nisse
>>
> Nils - is it just demo code or do you plan to do this to sample code 
> too (sample code is in src/share/sample/**)? One thing that isn't 
> clear to me is why this needs to be added to every file. Seems like a 
> warning in each demo's README should be sufficient.
>
> One specific file in the webrev that might need special treatment is 
> hprof_b_spec.h. That header file is essentially the "spec" to the 
> HPROF binary format (sad I know). It just seems a bit strange to add a 
> comment saying that it "has been deliberately simplified" to this file 
> specifically.
>
> -Alan.