RFR(XXS): 7133111: libsaproc debug print should be printed as unsigned long to fit large numbers on 64bit platform
David Holmes
david.holmes at oracle.com
Sun Apr 15 22:08:12 PDT 2012
On 5/04/2012 10:25 PM, Staffan Larsen wrote:
> Please review the following one-character fix to a printf format string. A 'z' is added to the printout of a size_t field.
Sorry I'm late to the party and this code already shipped. The z length
modifier is not linux specific but was added as part of the C99
standard. Is it also a gcc extension enabled by default (I don't think
we run in C99 mode by default) ?
But z simply changes the following d/i/o/u/x/X to indicate it refers to
a size_t - which is somewhat confusing as size_t is unsigned, so does
%zd print a signed or unsigned representation? If signed then the bug
still exists for really large numbers.
Note the same bug exists in the BSD version of the code.
I agree with Dan that the reference to "unsigned long" in the synopsis
is very confusing - please change the synopsis to reflect the actual
problem e.g: "debug print should format size_t correctly".
Thanks,
David
> Thanks,
> /Staffan
>
>
> diff --git a/agent/src/os/linux/ps_core.c b/agent/src/os/linux/ps_core.c
> --- a/agent/src/os/linux/ps_core.c
> +++ b/agent/src/os/linux/ps_core.c
> @@ -440,7 +440,7 @@
> int j = 0;
> print_debug("---- sorted virtual address map ----\n");
> for (j = 0; j< ph->core->num_maps; j++) {
> - print_debug("base = 0x%lx\tsize = %d\n", ph->core->map_array[j]->vaddr,
> + print_debug("base = 0x%lx\tsize = %zd\n", ph->core->map_array[j]->vaddr,
> ph->core->map_array[j]->memsz);
> }
> }
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list