Request for review (XS): Wrong filter predicate of visible locals in SA JSJavaFrame
Krystal Mok
rednaxelafx at gmail.com
Mon Apr 23 20:05:33 PDT 2012
Hi all,
Could I get a review for this patch, please?
Regards,
Kris
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Krystal Mok <rednaxelafx at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks, Staffan :-)
>
> - Kris
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Staffan Larsen <staffan.larsen at oracle.com
> > wrote:
>
>> Hi Kris,
>>
>> This fix looks good to me. I've created a bug for you: 7162726. I'll be
>> happy to push the fix for you once the review is done (need one Reviewer).
>>
>> Thanks,
>> /Staffan
>>
>> On 19 apr 2012, at 06:49, Krystal Mok wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> There seems to be a bug in the filtering logic of visible local variable
>> in Serviceability Agent's JSJavaFrame.
>>
>> I've made a patch here: [1]. The diff is against tip of jdk8/jdk8/hotspot
>> An example of running CLHSDB before and after applying the patch is
>> avaiable [2].
>>
>> Could anyone please review this for me?
>>
>> - Kris
>>
>> [1]: https://gist.github.com/2418558#file_getlocal.patch
>> [2]: https://gist.github.com/2418558#file_clhsdb_session2
>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/attachments/20120424/c0ad2347/attachment.html
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list