RFR: 7165755 OS Information much longer on linux than other platforms
Nils Loodin
nils.loodin at oracle.com
Mon May 14 01:41:13 PDT 2012
Right!
Well Staffan Larsen was, but he's gone on vacation this week. I'll dig up another.
I'm looking to push this to hotspot-rt as well as 7u6, which as you probably know is here:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/hsx/hsx23.2/hotspot/
Regards,
Nils Loodin
On May 12, 2012, at 14:22 , David Holmes wrote:
> Hi Nils,
>
> On 11/05/2012 11:45 PM, Nils Loodin wrote:
>> And, to be clear, I updated a few lines after the conversation with
>> David. Here's the lastest:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~nloodin/7165755/webrev.03
>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~nloodin/7165755/webrev.0>
>
> I'm okay with this change. Do you have a second reviewer for this final format?
>
>> Also, David, could you sponsor my push if you're happy?
>
> Where are you pushing to? hotspot-rt?
>
> I can do the push once my home directory server comes back online :(
>
> And once I see a second reviewer.
>
> Thanks,
> David
>
>
>> Dear regards,
>> Nils Loodin
>>
>> On May 11, 2012, at 14:07 , Nils Loodin wrote:
>>
>>> Lists accidentally dropped of here.
>>>
>>> For the official record, Davd Holmes, are you hereby happy with the
>>> state of my changes and ready to stand by that as an official reviewer? :)
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Nils Loodin
>>>
>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>
>>>> *From: *David Holmes <david.holmes at oracle.com
>>>> <mailto:david.holmes at oracle.com>>
>>>> *Subject: **Re: RFR: 7165755 OS Information much longer on linux than
>>>> other platforms*
>>>> *Date: *May 11, 2012 12:52:12 GMT+02:00
>>>> *To: *Nils Loodin <nils.loodin at oracle.com
>>>> <mailto:nils.loodin at oracle.com>>
>>>>
>>>> On 11/05/2012 5:22 PM, Nils Loodin wrote:
>>>>>> Missed one:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 39 #include "os_linux.hpp"
>>>>>>
>>>>> Gah. Indeed.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do we want the initial st->print("OS:") on the brief info the way we
>>>>>> have on the full info?
>>>>> I judged no, due to the fact that this would (well in our case anyway,
>>>>> but I thought generally) be used by other tools to get a brief info.
>>>>> They would then have that string as a label in a gui, or something else.
>>>>> Or if they want to print somewhere, they should print that string on
>>>>> their own.
>>>>
>>>> Ok.
>>>>
>>>>> About OS_xx.cpp including OS_xx.hpp, I feel I'm missing something.. can
>>>>> you please help me say why that's a no-no? And what does it have to do
>>>>> with the old included implementation?
>>>>
>>>> It isn't that it is wrong, it's that it hasn't been necessary. So I
>>>> was wondering why it was now necessary, as if it had been necessary I
>>>> would have expected it to be done when the old include system got
>>>> converted. I think these files only need include the generic os.hpp
>>>> and that it turn will include the platform specific ones.
>>>>
>>>>> Changing the above, are you ok with the changes?
>>>>
>>>> Yes.
>>>>
>>>> Though we should probably be having this conversation on the open
>>>> lists ;-)
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> David
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> David
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Nils Loodin
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/attachments/20120514/5a451373/attachment.html
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list