CCC (Was: request for codereview, bug 7149528: easy usage of serviceability agent)

[serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com]

Thanks!
Serguei

On 5/23/12 9:32 AM, Joe Darcy wrote:
> Hi Serguei,
>
> On 5/23/2012 2:52 AM, serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com wrote:
>> Hi Joe,
>>
>> In fact, we have the following question:
>>  Q1: Do we have to submit a CCC request to enable the HotSpot DTrace 
>> probes on Linux?
>
> There isn't a lot of information in the 7149528 bug report to give a 
> final answer, but I would lean on saying "yes" this requires a ccc.
>
>>
>> The following is not completely clear to me:
>>  Q2: Do we go through the CCC process when some interfaces are 
>> already enabled on one platform and we want to enable on another?
>
> Yes, a ccc would often be required in those circumstances.
>
> Cheers,
>
> -Joe
>
>>
>> My guess is that the answers must be positive but wanted to double-check.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Serguei
>>
>>
>> On 5/23/12 12:20 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
>>> Hi Joe,
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 11:22:09AM -0700, Joe Darcy wrote:
>>>> This state
>>>> model is explained in the "process" link at the top of every ccc
>>>> page and was additionally explained in a tech talk I gave earlier
>>>> this year:
>>>>
>>>>      http://j2se.us.oracle.com/web/pub/PrgMgmt/TechTalks/ccc-and-you.pdf
>>>>
>>>> Please do not blame excessive wait times on the ccc process when the
>>>> ccc is not being used as documented
>>> It looks like that site isn't publicly reachable. Could you put the
>>> document somewhere on openjdk.java.net or another more public place?
>>> I recently got a question about submitting a CCC request in response
>>> to one of my patches, but found very little documentation.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Mark
>>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/attachments/20120523/838ea75e/attachment.html