hs25 review request: 8007037 JSR 292: the VM_RedefineClasses::append_entry() should do cross-checks with indy operands (webrev link corrected)
serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com
serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com
Mon Apr 1 14:37:29 PDT 2013
The referenced CR links were incorrect as well.
The correct links:
CR:
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=8007037
https://jbs.oracle.com/bugs/browse/JDK-8007037
Webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sspitsyn/webrevs/2013/hotspot/8007037-JVMTI-JSR292.1/
Thanks,
Serguei
On 4/1/13 2:29 PM, serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com wrote:
> Resending this request because the webrev link below is incorrect.
> It is correct as you see it but its reference is incorrect when you
> click.
>
> This is a correct link (safe to click):
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sspitsyn/webrevs/2013/hotspot/8007037-JVMTI-JSR292.1/
>
>
> Thanks,
> Serguei
>
>
> On 3/27/13 4:45 PM, serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com wrote:
>> Please, review the hs25 fix below.
>>
>> Open webrev:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sspitsyn/webrevs/2013/hotspot/8007037-JVMTI-JSR292.1/
>>
>>
>> CR:
>> http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=8007037
>> https://jbs.oracle.com/bugs/browse/JDK-8007037
>>
>>
>> References from INDY bootstrap method specifier operands to CP entries
>> and back must be correctly merged at class redefinition.
>>
>> Some background.
>>
>> An invokedynamic bytecode spec:
>> http://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jvms/se7/html/jvms-6.html#jvms-6.5.invokedynamic
>>
>>
>> A invokedynamic instruction has an argument which is an index to the
>> *Constant Pool* item.
>> That index must be a symbolic reference to a *call-site specifier*:
>> http://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jvms/se7/html/jvms-4.html#jvms-4.4.10
>>
>>
>> A CP item of the type *CONSTANT_InvokeDynamic_inf* has an index into
>> the *bootstrap method attribute* of the class file:
>> http://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jvms/se7/html/jvms-4.html#jvms-4.7.21
>>
>>
>> The *|BootstrapMethods|* attribute elements normally have references
>> to other *Constant Pool* items.
>>
>> In VM the *bootstrap method attribute* is represented by the
>> *operands* array of the *ConstantPool*.
>>
>> The problem is is that all the force and back cross links between
>> *ConstantPool* elements
>> and *operands* array elements must be correctly merged at class
>> redefinition.
>>
>> Test coverage:
>> vm.mlvm, nsk.jvmti, nsk.jdi tests on multiple platforms (32 vs
>> 64-bit too).
>> The testing looks good so far.
>> One difficulty is that new vm.mlvm tests are currently failed
>> because of multiple reasons.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Serguei
>>
>>
>
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list