Review Request: 8006506: Add test for redefining methods in backtraces to java/lang/instrument tests

Stefan Karlsson stefan.karlsson at oracle.com
Fri Feb 1 03:27:16 PST 2013


On 2013-02-01 12:17, Stefan Karlsson wrote:
> On 2013-02-01 12:11, serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com wrote:
>> On 2/1/13 1:57 AM, Stefan Karlsson wrote:
>>> On 2013-02-01 10:22, serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com wrote:
>>>> Nice test!
>>>> It looks good.
>>> Thanks for reviewing!
>>>>
>>>> As the original bug and the test are non-trivial, it'd make sense 
>>>> to add a comment to
>>>> the class RedefineMethodInBacktraceApp and explain a little bit 
>>>> what the test is doing,
>>>> and what behavior is expected.
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~stefank/8006506/webrev.04/
>>>
>>> Tell me if you think this is good enough.
>>
>> It is good.
>>
>> Nit: it'd be enough if it is more specific. :)
>> This method is a key point:
>>    90     private static void touchRedefinedMethodInBacktrace(Throwable throwable) {
>>    91         throwable.getStackTrace();
>>    92     }
>> Is it true that the test expects the getStackTrace() does not crash nor
>> throw an exception which would happen if the old/obsolete method is 
>> gc'ed?
>
> I see. I'll add a comment that we shouldn't crash.

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~stefank/8006506/webrev.05/

StefanK

>
> Thanks,
> StefanK
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Serguei
>>
>>
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>> StefanK
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Sergueri
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2/1/13 12:13 AM, Stefan Karlsson wrote:
>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~stefank/8006506/webrev.03/
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) Reverted the ProblemList change, since the fix has already 
>>>>> propagaged to jdk8/tl
>>>>> 2) Renamed do_redefine -> doRedefine
>>>>> 3) Updated the .sh file with the bug number of the original CR 
>>>>> instead of the test CR.
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks,
>>>>> StefanK
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2013-01-22 14:11, Stefan Karlsson wrote:
>>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~stefank/8006506/webrev.00/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This test provokes the JVM crash described in bug: JDK-7174978.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I intend to push this to:
>>>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk
>>>>>>
>>>>>> thanks,
>>>>>> StefanK
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/attachments/20130201/34cf1ec7/attachment.html 


More information about the serviceability-dev mailing list