Request for review (XS): 8006563: Remove unused ProfileVM_lock
Aleksey Shipilev
aleksey.shipilev at oracle.com
Fri Jan 18 05:12:44 PST 2013
On 01/18/2013 04:58 PM, Rickard Bäckman wrote:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rbackman/8006563/
Looks good to me (not a Reviewer), modulo:
a) Are we sure this thing is not acquired in some weird way, i.e.
through JVMTI, SA, or whatnot?
b) The formatting of the predicate does not follow it's structure, I
think it should be:
...
this != Interrupt_lock &&
!(this == Safepoint_lock &&
contains(locks, Terminator_lock) &&
SafepointSynchronize::is_synchronizing())) {
This way it is more obvious SafepointSynchronize::is_synchronizing()) is
the !(...) group.
-Aleksey.
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list