RFR(S): 8016131: nsk/sysdict/vm/stress/chain tests crash the VM in 'entry_frame_is_first()'
Rickard Bäckman
rickard.backman at oracle.com
Mon Jul 15 23:59:56 PDT 2013
Vladimir,
I'll use the stack_base() method instead.
Thanks
/R
On Jul 16, 2013, at 8:56 AM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
> Rickard,
>
> One thing is_in_stack() has is check _stack_base == NULL. In your case it may not happen then you need to add assert to make sure it really does not happen. Or use stack_base() method which has the assert.
>
> Thanks,
> Vladimir
>
> On 7/15/13 10:11 PM, Rickard Bäckman wrote:
>> Vladimir & John,
>>
>> thanks for the suggestion. It makes sense.
>> Updated webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rbackman/8016131.u2/
>>
>> Thanks
>> /R
>>
>> On Jul 16, 2013, at 4:26 AM, John Rose wrote:
>>
>>> On Jul 15, 2013, at 9:59 AM, Vladimir Kozlov <vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> There are several methods already in Thread class which do similar address cheacks: on_local_stackO, is_in_stack(). It would be nice to have new check (at least part of it) at the same place.
>>>
>>> Yes, that's a good idea! Thread::is_in_usable_stack. That way the computation that involves stack_guard_size, etc., goes in thread.cpp which is more logical than in frame.cpp.
>>>
>>> — John
>>
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list