RFR(S): 8008357: [sampling] assert(sender_blob->is_runtime_stub() || sender_blob->is_nmethod()) failed: Impossible call chain

Rickard Bäckman rickard.backman at oracle.com
Tue Mar 26 07:03:13 PDT 2013


Still need a Reviewer…

Thanks
/R

On Mar 25, 2013, at 12:43 PM, Staffan Larsen wrote:

> Looks good to me - not a Reviewer.
> 
> /Staffan
> 
> On 25 mar 2013, at 12:13, Rickard Bäckman <rickard.backman at oracle.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> trying again, can I please have two reviews on this change?
>> Some small changes after offline discussion. 
>> 
>> The webrev is available here:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rbackman/8008357.u1/
>> 
>> Thanks
>> /R
>> 
>> On Mar 5, 2013, at 8:07 AM, Rickard Bäckman wrote:
>> 
>>> Anyone have time to look at this?
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> /R
>>> 
>>> On Mar 1, 2013, at 10:27 AM, Rickard Bäckman wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi all,
>>>> 
>>>> here comes another update to frame.safe_for_sender. 
>>>> If the PC at a place where the stack doesn't match the _frame_size we sometimes read an invalid return PC. 
>>>> In this case we read one that pointed into the Safepoint blob. 
>>>> 
>>>> We now pretty much guarded for all kind of blobs in safe_for_sender,
>>>> so I've changed the method to not assert in the end but to do it the same was as the frame_sparc.cpp did it. Everything that is not
>>>> a nmethod at the end of the method is not safe. 
>>>> 
>>>> I've also changed another check for a frame_size == 0 to frame_size <= 0 to make it somewhat more safer.
>>>> 
>>>> The bug: http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=8008357
>>>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rbackman/8008357/
>>>> 
>>>> This webrev is for HS24.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks
>>>> /R
>>> 
>> 
> 



More information about the serviceability-dev mailing list