RFR (s): 8009531: Crash when redefining class with annotated method

Coleen Phillimore coleen.phillimore at oracle.com
Wed Mar 27 05:12:24 PDT 2013


On 3/26/2013 9:27 PM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
> Forgot to comment on the test...
>
>
> On 3/26/13 4:11 PM, Coleen Phillimore wrote:
>> Summary: Neglected to copy the annotations in clone_with_new_data 
>> when they were moved to ConstMethod.
>>
>> open webrev at http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~coleenp/8009531/
>> bug link at http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=8009531
>>
>> Also. please review JDK test modified to test that this crash is 
>> fixed (will check in in two weeks).
>>
>> open webrev at http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~coleenp/8009531_jdk
> test/java/lang/instrument/RedefineMethodWithAnnotations.sh
>     No comments.
>
> test/java/lang/instrument/RedefineMethodWithAnnotationsTarget.java
>     The comment says:
>
>     25  * The first version of this class. The second version is in
>     26  * RedefineMethodWithAnnotationsTarget_2.java.
>
>     The code says:
>
>     31         System.out.println("Second version of 
> annotatedMethod(String)");
>     36         System.out.println("Second version of 
> annotatedMethod(int)");
>
>     Seems backwards, perhaps just to me.
>
> test/java/lang/instrument/RedefineMethodWithAnnotationsTarget_2.java
>     The comment says:
>
>     25  * This is the second version of this class. The first version 
> is in
>     26  * RedefineMethodWithAnnotationsTarget.java.
>
>     The code says:
>
>     33         System.out.println("First version of 
> annotatedMethod(int)");
>     38         System.out.println("First version of 
> annotatedMethod(String)");
>
>     Also seems backwards.

Oops.  Fixed.
Thanks!
Coleen
>
> Dan
>



More information about the serviceability-dev mailing list