review request for JDK-8013461 There is a symbol AsyncGetCallTrace in libjvm.symbols that does not exist in minimal/libjvm.a when DEBUG_LEVEL == release

[David Holmes]

<added servicability>

Hi Joe,

As I have previously stated you copied the struct definitions instead of 
moving them outside the ifdef.

Serviceability folk: we are particularly interested in whether the use 
of ticks_no_class_load is deemed appropriate in this situation. Who will 
be consuming this value?

Thanks,
David

On 21/05/2013 5:10 AM, JOSEPH PROVINO wrote:
> The change is to include forte.cpp in the minimal jvm but to
> conditionalize the code so that
> only AsyncGetCallTrace() is defined with the minimal jvm.
>
> Webrev is here: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jprovino/8013461/webrev.00/
>
>   * JDK-8013461 <https://jbs.oracle.com/bugs/browse/JDK-8013461>There is
>     a symbol AsyncGetCallTrace in libjvm.symbols that does not exist in
>     minimal/libjvm.a when DEBUG_LEVEL == release
>     <https://jbs.oracle.com/bugs/browse/JDK-8013461>
>
> Thanks.
>
> joe
>
>