review request for JDK-8013461 There is a symbol AsyncGetCallTrace in libjvm.symbols that does not exist in minimal/libjvm.a when DEBUG_LEVEL == release

[JOSEPH PROVINO]

On 5/20/2013 10:34 PM, David Holmes wrote:
> <added servicability>
>
> Hi Joe,
>
> As I have previously stated you copied the struct definitions instead 
> of moving them outside the ifdef.

I fixed this and will send out a new webrev.

joe

>
> Serviceability folk: we are particularly interested in whether the use 
> of ticks_no_class_load is deemed appropriate in this situation. Who 
> will be consuming this value?
>
> Thanks,
> David
>
> On 21/05/2013 5:10 AM, JOSEPH PROVINO wrote:
>> The change is to include forte.cpp in the minimal jvm but to
>> conditionalize the code so that
>> only AsyncGetCallTrace() is defined with the minimal jvm.
>>
>> Webrev is here: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jprovino/8013461/webrev.00/
>>
>>   * JDK-8013461 <https://jbs.oracle.com/bugs/browse/JDK-8013461>There is
>>     a symbol AsyncGetCallTrace in libjvm.symbols that does not exist in
>>     minimal/libjvm.a when DEBUG_LEVEL == release
>>     <https://jbs.oracle.com/bugs/browse/JDK-8013461>
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> joe
>>
>>