Review request for 7195249: Some jtreg tests use hard coded ports

Jaroslav Bachorik jaroslav.bachorik at oracle.com
Thu Nov 21 03:00:37 PST 2013


On 20.11.2013 18:38, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
> Roger,
>
> As soon as we close a socket nobody can guarantee that the port is free.
>
> Moreover, port returned by getFreePort()[1] remains not accessible for
> some time - it depends to system setup, take a look to discussions
> around SO_REUSEPORT for Linux or SO_REUSEADDR and SO_LINGER for BSD.
>
> So from stability point of view it's better to just return random number
> between 49152 and 65535.

Well, this doesn't seem to improve the odds by much. When there are more 
tests run in parallel, all of them requiring a free port, nothing 
prevents the random function to return the same port to all of them. 
Also, two subsequent requests can return the same port and cause 
problems with timing when a port used by a previous test is not fully 
ready to be assigned to a different socket. And as Dmitry pointed out 
unless one can keep hold of the allocated socket and use it later there 
is no guarantee that a port which was tested unallocated will remain 
unallocated also for the next few milliseconds.

The only fail proof solution would be a port allocating service provided 
by the harness. Until then we can only (hopefully) decrease the chance 
of intermittent failures due to a port being in use.

-JB-

>
> -Dmitry
>
>
> [1]
>
> 141     public static int getFreePort() throws InterruptedException,
> IOException {
>   142         int port = -1;
>   143
>   144         while (port <= 0) {
>   145             Thread.sleep(100);
>   146
>   147             ServerSocket serverSocket = null;
>   148             try {
>   149                 serverSocket = new ServerSocket(0);
>   150                 port = serverSocket.getLocalPort();
>   151             } finally {
>   152                 serverSocket.close();
>   153             }
>   154         }
>   155
>   156         return port;
>   157     }
>   158
>
>
> On 2013-11-20 19:40, roger riggs wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> fyi,  The jdk.testlibrary.Utils.getFreePort() method will Open an free
>> Socket, close it and return
>> the port number.
>>
>> And as Alan recommended, use (0) when possible to have the system assign
>> the port #.
>>
>> Roger
>>
>> On 11/20/2013 8:04 AM, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
>>> Taras,
>>>
>>> *The only* correct way to take really free port is:
>>>
>>> 1. Chose random number between 49152 and 65535
>>> 2. Open socket
>>>
>>> if socket fails - repeat step 1
>>> if socket OK - return *socket*
>>>
>>>
>>> If you can't keep the socket open (e.g. you have to pass port number as
>>> property value) you shouldn't do any pre-check as it has no value - as
>>> as soon as you close socket someone can take the port.
>>>
>>> So just choose a random number within the range above and let networking
>>> code opening socket to handle port conflict.
>>>
>>> -Dmitry
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2013-11-20 15:54, taras ledkov wrote:
>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>
>>>> I am working on bug https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-7195249.
>>>>
>>>> There are two webrevs:
>>>> Webrev for jdk part:
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~anazarov/7195249/jdk/webrev.00/
>>>>
>>>> Webrev for hs part:
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~anazarov/7195249/hs/webrev.00/
>>>>
>>>> Please take a look at some notes:
>>>> - After discussing with Yekaterina Kantserova & Jaroslav Bachorik some
>>>> shell tests have been converted to java based tests
>>>>
>>>> - PasswordFilePermissionTest & SSLConfigFilePermissionTest tests looked
>>>> very similar, so a common parent class was created for them:
>>>> AbstractFilePermissionTest
>>>>
>>>> - What was called RmiRegistrySslTest.java I've renamed to
>>>> RmiRegistrySslTestApp.java. The java code to replace old shell script
>>>> RmiRegistrySslTest.sh is called RmiRegistrySslTest.java, hence the huge
>>>> diff.
>>>>
>>>> - The new RmiRegistrySslTest.java has some lines similar to the
>>>> AbstractFilePermissionTest.java, I nevertheless decided to not
>>>> complicate the code further and leave it as is. Please let me know if
>>>> this is somehow not acceptable
>>>>
>>>> - com/oracle/java/testlibrary/Utils.java that is added to hotspot
>>>> repository is taken from this patch:
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ykantser/8023138/webrev.00/test/lib/testlibrary/jdk/testlibrary/Utils.java.sdiff.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> - These tests will need additional changes when test library process
>>>> tools will support command line options inheritance
>>>> (http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/2013-November/013235.html)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>



More information about the serviceability-dev mailing list