testlibrary (was Re: jmx-dev RFR: 8004926 sun/management/jmxremote/bootstrap/CustomLauncherTest.sh oftenly times out)
Chris Hegarty
chris.hegarty at oracle.com
Thu Sep 12 04:48:11 PDT 2013
On 09/12/2013 12:43 PM, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
> Chris,
>
> Does I understand correctly that we have two independent copy of
> testlibrary - one in hotspot workspace and other one in jdk workspace?
Unfortunately, I believe that is the case.
Are you seeing differences between them?
-Chris.
>
> -Dmitry
>
>
> On 2013-09-12 12:12, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>> On 09/12/2013 04:45 AM, David Holmes wrote:
>>> Hi Jaroslav,
>>>
>>> You need a copyright notice in the new file.
>>>
>>> As written this test can only run on a full JDK - so please add it to
>>> the :needs_jdk group in TEST.groups. (Does jcmd really needs to come
>>> from the test-jdk? And use the VMOPTS passed to the test?)
>>>
>>> Is there a reason this test can't run on OSX? I know it would need
>>> further modification but was wondering if there is something inherent in
>>> the test that makes it inapplicable to OSX.
>>>
>>> I think the test would be a lot simpler if the jdk tests had the hotspot
>>> test library's process tools available. :(
>>
>> We have some, is there an obvious gap?
>>
>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/file/e407df8093dc/test/lib/testlibrary/jdk/testlibrary/
>>
>>
>> -Chris.
>>
>>>
>>> David
>>> -----
>>>
>>> On 12/09/2013 1:39 AM, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
>>>> Please, review the patch for an intermittently failing test.
>>>>
>>>> The test is a shell test, using files for the interprocess
>>>> synchronization. This leads to intermittent failures.
>>>>
>>>> In order to fix this the test is rewritten in Java - the original
>>>> functionality and outputs should be 100% preserved. The patch is
>>>> unfortunately a bit difficult to follow since there is no similarity
>>>> between the *.sh and *.java file so one needs to go through the new
>>>> source in whole.
>>>>
>>>> The changes in "launcher" files are all about adding permissions to
>>>> execute (0755) and as such the webrev shows no differences.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Issue : JDK-8004926
>>>> Webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jbachorik/8004926/webrev.00
>>>>
>>>> -JB-
>>>>
>
>
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list