jmx-dev RFR: 8004926 sun/management/jmxremote/bootstrap/CustomLauncherTest.sh oftenly times out
Dmitry Samersoff
dmitry.samersoff at oracle.com
Thu Sep 12 08:13:31 PDT 2013
Jaroslav,
CustomLauncherTest.java:
102: this check could be moved to switch at ll. 108
otherwise test fails on "sunos" and "linux" because PLATFORM remains unset.
129: I would prefer don't have pattern like this one ever in shell
script. Could you prepare a list of VM's to check and just loop over it?
It makes test better readable. Also I think nowdays we can always use
server VM.
-Dmitry
On 2013-09-12 18:17, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
> On 09/12/2013 10:22 AM, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
>> On 09/12/2013 10:12 AM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>>> On 09/12/2013 04:45 AM, David Holmes wrote:
>>>> Hi Jaroslav,
>>>>
>>>> You need a copyright notice in the new file.
>>>>
>>>> As written this test can only run on a full JDK - so please add it to
>>>> the :needs_jdk group in TEST.groups. (Does jcmd really needs to come
>>>> from the test-jdk? And use the VMOPTS passed to the test?)
>>>>
>>>> Is there a reason this test can't run on OSX? I know it would need
>>>> further modification but was wondering if there is something inherent in
>>>> the test that makes it inapplicable to OSX.
>>>>
>>>> I think the test would be a lot simpler if the jdk tests had the hotspot
>>>> test library's process tools available. :(
>>>
>>> We have some, is there an obvious gap?
>>>
>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/file/e407df8093dc/test/lib/testlibrary/jdk/testlibrary/
>>
>> Hm, thanks for the info. I should have used this library instead.
>>
>> Please, stand by for the updated webrev.
>
> I was able to get rid off the JCMD. Using the testlibrary the target
> application can recognize its own PID and print it to its stdout. The
> main application then just reads the stdout to parse the PID. No need
> for JCMD any more.
>
> I could not find a way to remove the dependency on "test.jdk" system
> property. According to the jtreg web documentation
> (http://openjdk.java.net/jtreg/vmoptions.html#cmdLineOpts) a "test.java"
> system property should be available but in fact is not. But it seems
> that the testlibrary uses "test.jdk" system property too.
>
> The test does not run on OSX because nobody built the launcher binary :)
> I think it is a kind of DIY so I took the liberty of adding a
> linux-amd64 launcher while working on the test.
>
> While working with the test library I realized I was missing a crucial
> feature (at least for my purposes) - waiting for a certain message to
> appear in the stdout/stderr of the launched process. Very often I need
> to wait for the target process to get to certain point before the test
> can be allowed to continue - and the point is indicated by a message in
> stdout/stderr. Currently all the proc tools are designed to work in
> "batch" mode - the whole stdout/stderr is captured in strings and
> analyzed after the target process died - and are not suitable for this
> kind of usage.
>
> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jbachorik/8004926/webrev.01
>
>>
>> -JB-
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -Chris.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> David
>>>> -----
>>>>
>>>> On 12/09/2013 1:39 AM, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
>>>>> Please, review the patch for an intermittently failing test.
>>>>>
>>>>> The test is a shell test, using files for the interprocess
>>>>> synchronization. This leads to intermittent failures.
>>>>>
>>>>> In order to fix this the test is rewritten in Java - the original
>>>>> functionality and outputs should be 100% preserved. The patch is
>>>>> unfortunately a bit difficult to follow since there is no similarity
>>>>> between the *.sh and *.java file so one needs to go through the new
>>>>> source in whole.
>>>>>
>>>>> The changes in "launcher" files are all about adding permissions to
>>>>> execute (0755) and as such the webrev shows no differences.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Issue : JDK-8004926
>>>>> Webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jbachorik/8004926/webrev.00
>>>>>
>>>>> -JB-
>>>>>
>>
>
--
Dmitry Samersoff
Oracle Java development team, Saint Petersburg, Russia
* I would love to change the world, but they won't give me the sources.
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list