Need second 7u reviewer for [7u60] Request for phase 2 approval for CR 8019389: SA-JDI JSR292: sun.jvm.hotspot.jdi.StackFrame.thisObject() throws sun.jvm.hotspot.utilities.AssertionFailure: sanity check

Olivier Lagneau olivier.lagneau at oracle.com
Tue Feb 4 03:10:38 PST 2014


Thanks Serguei !

This is a 7u only fix. This code is already present in 8 and 9.

Olivier.

serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com said  on date 2/4/2014 12:03 PM:
> Hi Oliver,
>
> The fix looks good.
> Was this already fixed in the JDK 9 and 8?
>
> Thanks,
> Serguei
>
> On 2/4/14 2:15 AM, Olivier Lagneau wrote:
>> I need a second 7u reviewer for this 7u60 critical request fix (very 
>> simple fix).
>>
>> Could someone review it please ?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Olivier.
>>
>> Christian Thalinger said  on date 1/23/2014 10:09 PM:
>>> Looks good.
>>>
>>> On Jan 21, 2014, at 12:41 AM, Olivier Lagneau 
>>> <olivier.lagneau at oracle.com <mailto:olivier.lagneau at oracle.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Please find the new webrev with copyright date fixed (changed to 2014).
>>>>
>>>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~olagneau/8019389/webrev.01/ 
>>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eolagneau/8019389/webrev.01/>
>>>>
>>>> Olivier.
>>>>
>>>> Olivier Lagneau said  on date 1/20/2014 5:50 PM:
>>>>> Oops, right !
>>>>>
>>>>> Will fix that.
>>>>>
>>>>> Olivier.
>>>>>
>>>>> shanliang said  on date 1/20/2014 4:13 PM:
>>>>>> Olivier,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now it is 2014 :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Olivier Lagneau wrote:
>>>>>>> Please review the following simple fix.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8019389
>>>>>>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~olagneau/8019389/webrev.00/ 
>>>>>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eolagneau/8019389/webrev.00/>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The issue is due to the fact that _invokeHandle bytecode is 
>>>>>>> generated by hotspot,
>>>>>>> but is not declared in agent code. Just declaring the new 
>>>>>>> bytecode solves the assertion failure.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> However the tests reported in 8019389 
>>>>>>> (bootstrapOtherStratumInStackTrace, targetOtherStratumInStackTrace)
>>>>>>> suffer the problem from JDK-7016268 
>>>>>>> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-7016268> : Can't get 
>>>>>>> strata information through SA-JDI
>>>>>>> Thus, the "stratum mismatch" related to JDK-7016268 will still 
>>>>>>> be present after fix.
>>>>>>> This second problem has to be fixed through JDK-7016268.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Olivier.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/attachments/20140204/8ffc47b8/attachment.html 


More information about the serviceability-dev mailing list