8034856/8034857: More gcc warnings
Alan Bateman
Alan.Bateman at oracle.com
Sun Feb 23 01:19:33 PST 2014
On 19/02/2014 18:22, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
> :
>
> The documented grammar in the comment only mentions "SPACE" and the
> code below doesn't make any references to \t. As a matter of fact, it
> only checks for one single, mandatory SPACE after the colon (enforced
> at line 535-536) and doesn't care to remove any space characters at
> the end of the value. The while loop only deals with continuations. If
> additional spaces do exist they will as far as I can tell be part of
> the value. Are they trimmed later? I'm assuming it would be nice to
> have both parsers (parse_manifest & JarFacade) behave the same way?
>
> Here's what it would look like to only check for space, but still eat
> any additional spaces which doesn't match what
> parse_manifest/parse_nv_pair does:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mikael/webrevs/isspace/webrev.01/webrev/
>
Sorry for the delay getting back to you on this (I've been busy with
other things).
I checked the JAR File Specification, which is turn references RFC 822
as the "inspiration" for the name-value pairs. The SPACE token is just
ASCII SP. So I agree it's just ASCII SP that needs to be handled here,
not LWSP-char which includes ASCII HT.
Looking at JDK-6274276 then the trimming was done to avoid
hard-to-diagnose problems with leading/trailing spaces. It's possible
that this is inconsistent with other areas where JAR file attributes are
used. I would suggest leaving it as is for now as this is potentially
changing behavior in several areas.
-Alan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/attachments/20140223/d6a19933/attachment.html
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list