RFR 8030115: [parfait] warnings from b119 for jdk.src.share.native.sun.tracing.dtrace: JNI exception pending
Jaroslav Bachorik
jaroslav.bachorik at oracle.com
Fri Jul 25 13:04:28 UTC 2014
On 07/25/2014 01:40 PM, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
> Jaroslav,
>
> readProviderData already use CHECK
>
> So it might be better to:
>
> 1. change readProviderData to return 0 on error and 1 on success.
>
> 2. add check for exception to ll 201 and abort the loop if at least
> one of providers is not read.
Ok, here is another attempt, now without introducing a new function.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jbachorik/8030115/webrev.01
-JB-
>
>
> -Dmitry
>
>
> On 2014-07-24 15:07, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
>> Please, review the change for the fix of the following problem
>>
>> In jdk/src/share/native/sun/tracing/dtrace/JVM.c the following code is
>> invoked in loop
>>
>> 198 for (i = 0; i < num_providers; ++i) {
>> 199 JVM_DTraceProvider* p = &(jvm_providers[i]);
>> 200 jobject provider = (*env)->GetObjectArrayElement(
>> 201 env, providers, i);
>> 202 readProviderData(env, provider, p);
>> 203 }
>>
>> The first problem is that GetGetObjectArrayElement() call on L200 may
>> throw an exception which is not checked subsequently. On L202 the call
>> to readProviderData() can also raise a Java exception without
>> appropriate after-check. When getting back to the beginning of the loop
>> GetObjectArrayElement() may be called with a pending exception which is
>> deemed unsafe.
>>
>> The fix extracts the inner part of the loop into a separate function
>> where the result of each step is properly checked for pending
>> exceptions. If there is a pending exception the loop will be
>> interrupted, resources cleaned and
>> Java_sun_tracing_dtrace_JVM_activate0() function will return 0 with the
>> pending exception recorded in env.
>>
>>
>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jbachorik/8030115/webrev.00
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> -JB-
>
>
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list