RFR JDK-8046282: SA update
A. Sundararajan
sundararajan.athijegannathan at oracle.com
Mon Jun 9 09:26:57 UTC 2014
Since SA is java code, we could have it cleaner..
my 2 cents,
-Sundar
On Monday 09 June 2014 02:40 PM, Poonam Bajaj wrote:
> Hi Sundar,
>
> Yes, it is possible to do that. e.g. G1YCType can be defined like this.
>
> public enum G1YCType {
> Normal ("Normal"),
> InitialMark ("Initial Mark"),
> DuringMark ("During Mark"),
> Mixed ("Mixed"),
> G1YCTypeEndSentinel ("Unknown")
>
> private final String value;
>
> G1YCType(String val) {
> this.value = val;
> }
> public String value() {
> return value;
> }
> }
>
> But, my purpose of having a class and an enum being used in that class
> was to have the similar kind of code structure on the SA side as is
> present on the hotspot side. e.g the above is defined as the following
> on the hotspot side:
>
> 030 enum G1YCType {
> 031 Normal,
> 032 InitialMark,
> 033 DuringMark,
> 034 Mixed,
> 035 G1YCTypeEndSentinel
> 036 };
> 037
> 038 class G1YCTypeHelper {
> 039 public:
> 040 static const char* to_string(G1YCType type) {
> 041 switch(type) {
> 042 case Normal: return "Normal";
> 043 case InitialMark: return "Initial Mark";
> 044 case DuringMark: return "During Mark";
> 045 case Mixed: return "Mixed";
> 046 default: ShouldNotReachHere(); return NULL;
> 047 }
> 048 }
> 049 };
>
> And I have tried to replicate the same on the SA side so that one can
> easily understand and map the definitions on both the sides.
>
> 27 public class G1YCTypeHelper {
> 28
> 29 public enum G1YCType {
> 30 Normal,
> 31 InitialMark,
> 32 DuringMark,
> 33 Mixed,
> 34 G1YCTypeEndSentinel
> 35 }
> 36
> 37 public static String toString(G1YCType type) {
> 38 switch (type) {
> 39 case Normal:
> 40 return "Normal";
> 41 case InitialMark:
> 42 return "Initial Mark";
> 43 case DuringMark:
> 44 return "During Mark";
> 45 case Mixed:
> 46 return "Mixed";
> 47 default:
> 48 return null;
> 49 }
> 50 }
> 51 }
>
>
> Please let me know if this is still a concern for you.
>
> Thanks,
> Poonam
>
> On 6/9/2014 10:38 AM, A. Sundararajan wrote:
>> The pattern of enum within a class and toString helper to return
>> string description of it -- is used for many cases.
>>
>> Why not use enums with String accepting constructor and toString (or
>> new method called "toDescription()) override? You could have add
>> "Unknown" in these enums to map to an option that is available in VM
>> -- but not in SA.
>>
>> Since it is a debugger it is expected to work with incomplete info..
>> so whereever you map a VM data structure element to java enum, you
>> can map unknown enum constants to "Unknown" on Java side. Of course,
>> if there is a sentinel element defined in VM side, you could use that
>> itself - no need for "Unknown" in such cases.
>>
>> It'd nice to simplify that class-within-enum pattern...
>>
>> -Sundar
>>
>> On Saturday 07 June 2014 02:48 PM, Poonam Bajaj wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Please review these changes for the bug 8046282 for JDK 9. These
>>> changes add some definitions on the SA side and the supporting code
>>> on the hotspot side.
>>>
>>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~poonam/8046282/webrev.00/
>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8046282
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Poonam
>>>
>>
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list