RFR(M): 8028474: sun/jvmstat/monitor/MonitoredVm/MonitorVmStartTerminate.sh timeout, leaves looping process behind

Staffan Larsen staffan.larsen at oracle.com
Thu Jun 26 11:22:13 UTC 2014


Indentation around JavaProcess.getId() is weird.

JavaProcess.getPid/setPid/pid do not appear to be used.

JavaProcess.waitForRemoval: How about using timestamps (currentTimeMillis()) before the loop and for each iteration to determine if the timeout has expired (instead of "time+=100”)?

nit: missing empty line before line 139, method releaseStarted().

/Staffan


On 26 jun 2014, at 00:56, Erik Gahlin <erik.gahlin at oracle.com> wrote:

> It didn't work. 
> 
> There's no termination notification, if I use Process#destroyForcibly(). I believe the hsperfdata file is left behind so it will not be able to detect that the process has died.
> 
> Here is an updated version that renames some variable/methods.
> 
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~egahlin/8028474_3/
> 
> Thanks
> Erik
> 
> Erik Gahlin skrev 2014-06-18 09:37:
>> Didn't know about destroyForcibly(). I could try that.
>> 
>> Erik
>> 
>> Staffan Larsen skrev 18/06/14 09:26:
>>> Erik,
>>> 
>>> How about using Process.destroyForcibly() as a means to terminate the process instead of using files for signaling?
>>> 
>>> /Staffan
>>>  
>>> On 17 jun 2014, at 23:13, Erik Gahlin <erik.gahlin at oracle.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Yes, very weird
>>>> 
>>>> Could have been that I needed the tools.jar in the child processes, or it could have been something else. If I remember correctly, I got a CNF that I didn't get with the shell script, but it was few months back.
>>>> 
>>>> Anyway, I retried with JPRT and now it works without the shell script.
>>>> 
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~egahlin/8028474_2/
>>>> 
>>>> Erik
>>>> 
>>>> Staffan Larsen skrev 2014-06-16 13:49:
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 16 jun 2014, at 12:32, Erik Gahlin <erik.gahlin at oracle.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Yekaterina Kantserova skrev 13/06/14 12:59:
>>>>>>> Erik,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> is there some reason why we need to keep MonitorVmStartTerminate.sh? I've moved the JTreg header to MonitorVmStartTerminate.java
>>>>>> Hi Katja,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> That's how I did the test initially, and it works locally, but I could never get it to work in JPRT without the shell script. I believe the tools.jar is not on the class path.
>>>>> 
>>>>> That is weird. I see other tests that depend in tools.jar and they work fine.
>>>>> 
>>>>> /Staffan
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Erik
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> /*
>>>>>>>  * @test
>>>>>>>  * @bug 4990825
>>>>>>>  * @summary attach to external but local JVM processes
>>>>>>>  * @library /lib/testlibrary
>>>>>>>  * @build jdk.testlibrary.*
>>>>>>>  * @run main MonitorVmStartTerminate
>>>>>>>  */
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> and the test works just fine.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The JTreg run contains all pathes and system properties MonitorVmStartTerminate.sh tries to construct:
>>>>>>> ${JAVA} ${TESTVMOPTS} -Dtest.jdk=${TESTJAVA} -Dtest.classes=${TESTCLASSES} -classpath ${CP} MonitorVmStartTerminate
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> See the log attached.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Note @build jdk.testlibrary.* instead of @build jdk.testlibrary.ProcessTools to make sure all testlibrary classes are compiled 
>>>>>>> to the right place when running tests concurrently.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Katja (Not a Reviewer)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 06/12/2014 12:37 AM, Erik Gahlin wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi, 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Could I have a review of a test that has been failing 
>>>>>>>> intermittently. The test now uses files for synchronization 
>>>>>>>> instead of waiting for a process that sleeps. 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Webrev: 
>>>>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~egahlin/8028474/ 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Bug: 
>>>>>>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8028474 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Description: 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The test starts ten Java processes, each with a unique id. 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>  Each process creates a file named after the id and then it waits for 
>>>>>>>>  the test to remove the file, at which the Java process exits. 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>  The processes are monitored by the test to make sure notifications 
>>>>>>>>  are sent when processes are started/terminated. 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>  To avoid Java processes being left behind, in case of an unexpected 
>>>>>>>>  failure, shutdown hooks are registered that remove files when the test 
>>>>>>>>  exits. If files are not removed, i.e. due to a JVM crash, 
>>>>>>>>  the Java processes will exit themselves after 1000 s. 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Thanks 
>>>>>>>> Erik 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/attachments/20140626/5fb518f5/attachment.html>


More information about the serviceability-dev mailing list