RFR 8037274 : sun.tools.attach.WindowsVirtualMachine#createPipe() needs more descriptive message when pipe creation fails
Peter Allwin
peter.allwin at oracle.com
Fri Mar 14 15:46:03 UTC 2014
Also I guess you want to use ‘msg’ on line 277, other than that it looks good to me!
Thanks!
/peter
On 14 Mar 2014, at 16:43, Jaroslav Bachorik <jaroslav.bachorik at oracle.com> wrote:
> On 14.3.2014 16:40, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
>> On 3/14/14 9:28 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
>>> On 14/03/2014 15:21, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Like this?
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jbachorik/8037274/webrev.03
>>> This looks okay and I assume you've tested this to ensure that the
>>> exception has the message. A minor comment is that we prefer snprintf
>>> over sprintf but the buffer is very over sized here so not an issue.
>>>
>>> -Alan
>>
>> I think some of the static security analysis tools will flag use of
>> sprintf() as something that needs to be investigated. Probablybetter
>> to switch to snprintf() to avoid false reports.
>>
>> Dan
>>
>> P.S.
>> I _think_ parfait is smart enough not to do this but other
>> static analysis tools may not be.
>
> Ok. I will change it to snprintf(). Anyway, it is better to have it the way it is usually done.
>
> -JB-
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list