RFR(XXS) update 8u fix for 8028073 now that 8028280 is backported to 8u (8038274)

[Daniel D. Daugherty]

You're very welcome and groan... :-)

Dan


On 3/26/14 3:30 AM, David Holmes wrote:
> Thanks Dan! Good to see this all in sync now. (pardon the pun :) )
>
> David H.
>
> On 26/03/2014 2:53 AM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> Mr Simms' fix for the following bug has been backported to JDK8u-hs-dev:
>>
>>      8028280 ParkEvent leak when running modified runThese which only
>>              loads classes
>>      https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8028280
>>
>> which allows the JDK8u-hs-dev version of the fix for the following bug
>> to be updated to match the JDK9-hs version:
>>
>>      8028073 race condition in ObjectMonitor implementation causing
>> deadlocks
>>      https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8028073
>>
>> This minor tweak is being done with the following bug:
>>
>>      8038274 update 8u fix for 8028073 now that 8028280 is backported 
>> to 8u
>>      https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8038274
>>
>> Here is the webrev:
>>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dcubed/8038274-webrev/0-jdk8u-hs-dev/
>>
>> Since this is effectively a backport from JDK9-hs -> JDK8u-hs-dev,
>> I'm looking for one sanity check (R)eviewer or reviewer from the
>> original set of folks that reviewed 8028073:
>>
>>      The JDK9 reviewers:  dholmes, sspitsyn, dice, acorn
>>      The JDK8u reviewers: rdurbin, acorn, sspitsyn, dsimms, dholmes
>>
>> Because I'm paranoid, I'm running the same set of vm.quick testing
>> Adhoc test jobs and StressMonitorWait testing that was done on the
>> JDK9 and JDK8u versions of the fix.
>>
>> Thanks, in advance, for any comments, questions or suggestions.
>>
>> Dan