RFR 8040748: [TESTBUG] Exclude failing (serviceability) jtreg tests

[Staffan Larsen]

Mikael,

I just the final review for JDK-8031126 so I will be pushing that shortly to jdk9/hs-rt. Would you mind removing that entry from your change (unless you have already pushed it).

Thanks,
/Staffan

On 5 maj 2014, at 16:42, Mikael Auno <mikael.auno at oracle.com> wrote:

> Thanks for spotting it. New webrev at
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~miauno/8040748/webrev.03/.
> 
> Mikael
> 
> On 2014-05-05 16:18, Staffan Larsen wrote:
>> 8039432 is Resolved and should not be listed.
>> 
>> /Staffan
>> 
>> On 5 maj 2014, at 15:26, Mikael Auno <mikael.auno at oracle.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> I've updated this change to use ProblemList.txt instead of @ignore
>>> (since that was only intended for hotspot/test and not jdk/test). I've
>>> also updated the data to nightly failures from the last two weeks with
>>> issues since then filtered out manually.
>>> 
>>> Hopefully this should address all concerns.
>>> 
>>> New webrev at http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~miauno/8040748/webrev.02/
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Mikael
>>> 
>>> On 2014-04-25 08:15, Staffan Larsen wrote:
>>>> For test/com/sun/jdi/JdbReadTwiceTest.sh, you list JDK-8002116, but that bug is resolved so should not be reason to quarantine the test.
>>>> 
>>>> For test/com/sun/jdi/RepStep.java you list JDK-6471769 JDK-6766320 but both of those are closed so should not be reason to quarantine the test.
>>>> 
>>>> For test/demo/jvmti/mtrace/TraceJFrame.java you list JDK-8035195 and JDK-8039432, but 8035195 seems to be just an old name for 8039432 (looking it up in JBS takes you to 8039432). So 8035195 should not be listed.
>>>> 
>>>> For test/sun/tools/jinfo/Basic.sh, there are no open bugs against it (except JDK-6542634 which is a timeout from 2007 and I’m not sure it is valid) so I don’t think it should be quarantined.
>>>> 
>>>> /Staffan
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 24 apr 2014, at 20:01, Mikael Auno <mikael.auno at oracle.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> I've now added the keyword "quarantine" as well as fixed an issue with
>>>>> placement of the @ignore tag (it's not allowed to come before @library).
>>>>> 
>>>>> New webrev at http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~miauno/8040748/webrev.01/
>>>>> 
>>>>> Local testing:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> % jtreg -jdk $JAVA_HOME -k:quarantine -ignore:quiet -verbose:summary /localhome/ws/jdk9-dev/jdk/test/
>>>>>> Test results: no tests selected
>>>>>> Report written to /localhome/temp/run/JTreport/html/report.html
>>>>>> Results written to /localhome/temp/run/JTwork
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Mikael
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 2014-04-22 17:12, Stefan Särne wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Mikael,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I think we should use a key word to group quarantined tests, which can be used to run the tests as a separate batch. Recommend to add this to all tests:
>>>>>> @key quarantine
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Note that you may have to add the key word as a known key word to the TEST.ROOT file as well.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>> Stefan
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: Mikael Auno 
>>>>>> Sent: den 16 april 2014 19:51
>>>>>> To: serviceability-dev at openjdk.java.net
>>>>>> Subject: RFR 8040748: [TESTBUG] Exclude failing (serviceability) jtreg tests using @ignore
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Please, review the following fix adding the @ignore tag to a couple of serviceability tests
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Issue:  https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8040748
>>>>>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~miauno/8040748/webrev.00/
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Mikael
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>