RFR: 8064799: [TESTBUG] JT-Reg Serviceability tests to be run as part of JPRT submit job

[Alan Bateman]

On 13/11/2014 13:56, Mikael Auno wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could I please get a review of this addition of SVC tests to JPRT submit
> jobs. So far, I'm only adding JDI tests as those are the only ones I
> have completed code coverage analysis on to determine the best subset to
> add. The other areas will be added too, but I'm adding these now to get
> the ball rolling asap.
>
> I've run these through JPRT once already without failures and have got
> two more runs in the pipe. I've also looked through the history for
> these tests and found that they do not have any known instabilities to
> worry about.
>
> Issue:  https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8064799
> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~miauno/8064799/webrev.00/
>
>
This doesn't look very maintainable.  If we are adding *_sanity groups 
then would be better to move them to their own section of the file so 
that they are in the middle of the main grouping of the tests? Also I 
think we should avoid list individual tests if we can, would it be 
better to leave out JDI until your analysis is completed?

-Alan