RFR: 8039995: Test serviceability/sa/jmap-hashcode/Test8028623.java fails on some Linux/Mac machines.
KEVIN WALLS
kevin.walls at oracle.com
Thu Nov 20 18:38:08 UTC 2014
Hi,
I'm resurrecting this thread to revisit this testcase, the one that
fails if not in an environment where an SA attach is permitted (which is
linux systems with 1 in /proc/sys/kernel/yama/ptrace_scope, and mac
systems as a non-root user).
There are times when we want to check if an SA attach is likely to work,
so in the following webrev I've put that in the testlibrary.
In doing this I now realise that heap dumping with jmap/sa is broken, as
reported in: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044416
I won't remove the @ignore in this change, but it would make sense to me
to do the fix below, including backporting to places where jmap -F still
works.
webrev
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kevinw/8039995/webrev.01/
bug
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8039995
Thanks
Kevin
On 24/05/2014 19:25, Kevin Walls wrote:
>
> Thanks Peter, and thanks Dmitry -
>
> So another thread on this has started about why such a test runs in an
> environment that can't expected to attach to its own processes anyway:
> seems that some test systems permit that, and some run as a user that
> can't necessarily expect to have that ability.
>
> (Dmitry I'm not sure about exiting with that error value? If that's
> something people are meant to know about I have missed it. But the
> test would fail if jmap didn't create the heap dump file, i.e. if it
> fails but doesn't exit with the right code.)
>
> For the moment I'll wait on that other information for whether this
> needs to be fixed in the test...
>
> Thanks!
> Kevin
>
>
>
>
> On 23/05/14 12:00, Peter Allwin wrote:
>> Looks good to me!
>>
>>
>> Thanks for looking at this Kevin,
>> /peter
>>
>> On 20 May 2014, at 13:14, Kevin Walls <kevin.walls at oracle.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi - any comments? 8-)
>>>
>>> On 12/05/14 16:02, Kevin Walls wrote
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to get a review of this test change. It assumed that jmap
>>>> would have permission to run on a process that the test itself
>>>> created, but this is not necessarily the case.
>>>>
>>>> Here I'm considering it OK to skip (pass) the test where jmap fails
>>>> to attach. The test itself was not platform-specific and as long
>>>> as we have other platforms where jmap step will work, we are
>>>> testing for this problem.
>>>>
>>>> bug:
>>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8039995
>>>>
>>>> webrev:
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kevinw/8039995/webrev.00/
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Kevin
>
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list