RFR(L): 8056049: getProcessCpuLoad() stops working in one process when a different process exits
Markus Grönlund
markus.gronlund at oracle.com
Wed Oct 22 09:43:49 UTC 2014
Greetings,
Kindly asking for reviews for the following changeset.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8056049
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mgronlun/8056049/webrev01/
Description:
The issue is Windows specific. And the problem relates to using the Performance Data Helper API (PDH), more specifically how to use the "Process" PDH object in PDH queries:
// code comment extract
/*
* Working against the Process object and it's related counters is inherently problematic
* when using the PDH API:
*
* For PDH, a process is not primarily identified by it's process id,
* but with a sequential number, for example \Process(java#0), \Process(java#1), ....
* The really bad part is that this list is reset as soon as one process exits:
* If \Process(java#1) exits, \Process(java#3) now becomes \Process(java#2) etc.
*
* The PDH query api requires a process identifier to be submitted when registering
* a query, but as soon as the list resets, the query is invalidated (since the name
* changed).
*
* Solution:
* The #number identifier for a Process query can only decrease after process creation.
*
* Therefore we create an array of counter queries for all process object instances
* up to and including ourselves:
*
* Ex. we come in as third process instance (java#2), we then create and register
* queries for the following Process object instances:
* java#0, java#1, java#2
*
* currentQueryIndexForProcess() keeps track of the current "correct" query
* (in order to keep this index valid when the list resets from underneath,
* ensure to call getCurrentQueryIndexForProcess() before every query involving
* Process object instance data).
*/
I have already fixed this in the VM as of https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8019921
In the process of fixing this issue now in the JDK, I realized that the previous implementation of using PDH in the JDK was a bit convoluted - especially if you would like to reuse functionality / add new counters.
Therefore this change also includes an overall rewrite of the how the JDK will interface with the PDH library, a rewrite of which (hopefully) improves both readability and extensibility.
I can do a code walkthrough live if anyone is interested to know the exact details of this change.
Testing completed : Testset SVC (includes jdk_instrument, jdk_management, jdk_jmx, jdk_jdi)
Thanks in advance
Markus
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/attachments/20141022/058fa2be/attachment.html>
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list