RFR(S): JDK-8068007 [Findbugs] SA com.sun.java.swing.action.ActionManager.manager should be package protect
Dmitry Samersoff
dmitry.samersoff at oracle.com
Thu Apr 2 12:51:57 UTC 2015
Jaroslav,
Thank you!
-Dmitry
On 2015-04-02 15:45, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
> On 2.4.2015 14:35, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
>> Fix updated.
>
> I like this better. Still rather convoluted but it seems to be as good
> as we can get without a bigger rewrite.
>
> I'm ok with this change.
>
> Cheers,
>
> -JB-
>
>>
>> On 2015-04-02 15:05, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
>>> David,
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2015-04-02 14:45, David Holmes wrote:
>>>> Hi Dmitry,
>>>>
>>>> On 2/04/2015 9:27 PM, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
>>>>> Everybody,
>>>>>
>>>>> Please review a small fix.
>>>>>
>>>>> The fix goes to 9 and 8u at the same time.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dsamersoff/JDK-8068007/webrev.01/
>>>>
>>>> Not sure I understand the bug synopsis in relation to the fix. Sounds
>>>> like FindBugs complained about using a protected static field that was
>>>> set directly via a subclass. Not sure why. So now we have a private
>>>> field that can be set by anyone via a public method. Maybe the
>>>> setInstance method should be protected not public?
>>>
>>> Agree - I'll update the fix.
>>>
>>>> But do we really care? Either ways seems fine to me if it silences
>>>> FindBugs.
>>>
>>> Yes, this is the goal.
>>>
>>> -Dmitry
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
--
Dmitry Samersoff
Oracle Java development team, Saint Petersburg, Russia
* I would love to change the world, but they won't give me the sources.
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list