[PING-2] RFR 6425769: jmx remote bind address

[Jaroslav Bachorik]

On 9.12.2015 14:55, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-12-01 at 14:19 +0100, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>> Hi Jaroslav,
>>
>> On Tue, 2015-12-01 at 12:33 +0100, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
>>> On 1.12.2015 11:17, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 2015-11-09 at 10:32 +0100, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 2015-11-04 at 11:54 +0100, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Updated webrev with jtreg test in Java:
>>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-6425769/02/
>>>>>> bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6425769
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I believe this updated webrev addresses all concerns and
>>>>>> incorporates
>>>>>> suggestions brought up by Jaroslav and Daniel.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm still looking for a sponsor and a hotspot/servicability-
>>>>>> dev
>>>>>> reviewer. Could somebody maintaining javax.rmi.ssl have a
>>>>>> look at
>>>>>> this
>>>>>> as well? Thank you!
>>>>>
>>>>> Ping? Friendly reminder that I still need reviewers and a
>>>>> sponsor for
>>>>> this.
>>>>
>>>> Anyone?
>>>
>>> I'm sorry for not spotting this earlier:
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-6425769/03.no-rmi-
>>> ssl-factory-
>>> changes/jdk/src/java.management/share/classes/sun/management/jmxrem
>>> ote/ConnectorBootstrap.java.sdiff.html
>>> * L442 - the log would contain 'com.sun.management.jmxremote.host
>>> =
>>> null' if host is not specified; might be better not to print this
>>> out at all
>>
>> Updated webrev which does not print
>> 'com.sun.management.jmxremote.host = null' if unset:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-6425769/05/
>>
>>> Other than that the change looks good to me. If no one else is
>>> volunteering I may sponsor this change.
>>
>> Thank you!
>
> Jaroslav, are you still willing to sponsor this? There hasn't been much
> movement :-/

Sure. I need to start the compatibility review process before 
integration and it might take some time.

-JB-

>
> Thanks,
> Severin
>