RFR: 6588467: Add isDaemon() and getPriority() to ThreadInfo

[Jeremy Manson]

Thanks for taking a look, Staffan.  Sorry about the delay.  I've gone ahead
and made a test:

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jmanson/6588467/webrev.01/

Can anyone drive the API process?  It's such a minor change that I can't
imagine it wouldn't go through easily.  Of course, I have no idea what's
involved.

Jeremy

On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 11:10 PM, Staffan Larsen <staffan.larsen at oracle.com>
wrote:

>
> > On 13 jan 2015, at 06:28, David Holmes <david.holmes at oracle.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Jeremy,
> >
> > On 13/01/2015 4:32 AM, Jeremy Manson wrote:
> >> Hi folks,
> >>
> >> This was long forgotten, seems to have been lost in the shuffle.  I've
> >> done it, since we could use it, too:
> >>
> >> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6588467
> >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jmanson/6588467/webrev.00/
> >
> > Codewise this all appears fine to me.
>
> Thanks for doing this. I have only scanned the code, but did not see any
> test. Could you please add tests for the new API?
>
> >> Since it is an API change (albeit an uncontroversial one), it will have
> >> to go through whatever the super-secret API change review process is
> >> that you folks do.
> >
> > Not sure if this just needs an API tweak or a JMX spec revision. If the
> latter then this might be a big deal. But I'll leave that to the official
> serviceability folk :)
>
> No spec revision is needed, same process as for all API changes.
> Unfortunately I don’t have the time to drive that, so hoping someone else
> can jump in.
>
> /Staffan
>
> >
> > Cheers,
> > David
> >
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >> Jeremy
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/attachments/20150209/dc62ca40/attachment.html>