RFR: 6588467: Add isDaemon() and getPriority() to ThreadInfo
Jeremy Manson
jeremymanson at google.com
Tue Feb 17 23:58:56 UTC 2015
Since this is not my code, I will happily defer to the people whose code it
is on these matters. I can very easily replace all of the <tt> instances,
or just the new ones, or none at all. Just let me know.
(My general preference in my own code is to separate feature changes and
cleanup changes, just so that the history is more comprehensible, but I can
certainly understand that you might not want to go that way when the cost
of a checkin is so high.)
Jeremy
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Mandy Chung <mandy.chung at oracle.com> wrote:
> On 2/17/15 3:10 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
>
> I don't think feature changes should be mixed with maintenance.
>
> Code janitor is the most honourable profession, and it would be awesome
> for a code janitor to convert the entire jdk to {@code but feature
> contributors should not be asked to do so.
>
>
> That's why I didn't ask at first :)
>
> I prefer the new javadoc to use {@code...} even though inconsistent with
> other methods as they were defined since 1.5.
>
> Mandy
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Mandy Chung <mandy.chung at oracle.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 2/17/15 9:31 AM, Jeremy Manson wrote:
>>
>> Hey Mandy,
>>
>> Thanks for taking a look. Are we okay making those changes even though
>> none of the other methods in ThreadInfo follow those conventions? Not sure
>> whether consistency matters more or less than doing it right.
>>
>>
>> I wont object and actually be grateful if you want to convert all
>> <tt>...</tt> to {@code ...}. Staffan may have a different opinion.
>>
>> Mandy
>>
>>
>> Jeremy
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Mandy Chung <mandy.chung at oracle.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Jeremy,
>>>
>>> On 2/9/2015 4:51 PM, Jeremy Manson wrote:
>>>
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jmanson/6588467/webrev.01/ <
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ejmanson/6588467/webrev.01/>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> The change looks okay to me.
>>>
>>> Nit: It would be good for the new methods to replace <tt>...</tt> with
>>> {@code ...}. line 600, 603 {@code ThreadInfo}. It would be good to add
>>> {@linkplain Thread#isDaemon daemon thread} or @see Thread#isDaemon .
>>> Similarly Thread#getPriority.
>>>
>>> thanks
>>> Mandy
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/attachments/20150217/0d6e27fb/attachment.html>
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list