RFR: 8073713 javadoc warnings in serviceability code

[Markus Gronlund]

Looks good.

/Markus

-----Original Message-----
From: Staffan Larsen 
Sent: den 24 februari 2015 10:08
To: serviceability-dev
Subject: RFR: 8073713 javadoc warnings in serviceability code

Please review these small fixes to javadoc in some of the serviceability code.

Thanks,
/Staffan

diff --git a/src/java.management/share/classes/com/sun/management/HotSpotDiagnosticMXBean.java b/src/java.management/share/classes/com/sun/management/HotSpotDiagnosticMXBean.java
--- a/src/java.management/share/classes/com/sun/management/HotSpotDiagnosticMXBean.java
+++ b/src/java.management/share/classes/com/sun/management/HotSpotDiagno
+++ sticMXBean.java
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@
  * All methods throw a {@code NullPointerException} if any input argument is
  * {@code null} unless it's stated otherwise.
  *
- * @see ManagementFactory#getPlatformMXBeans(Class)
+ * @see 
+ java.lang.management.ManagementFactory#getPlatformMXBeans(Class)
  */
 @jdk.Exported
 public interface HotSpotDiagnosticMXBean extends PlatformManagedObject { diff --git a/src/jdk.attach/share/classes/com/sun/tools/attach/AttachOperationFailedException.java b/src/jdk.attach/share/classes/com/sun/tools/attach/AttachOperationFailedException.java
--- a/src/jdk.attach/share/classes/com/sun/tools/attach/AttachOperationFailedException.java
+++ b/src/jdk.attach/share/classes/com/sun/tools/attach/AttachOperationF
+++ ailedException.java
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@
      * Constructs an <code>AttachOperationFailedException</code> with
      * the specified detail message.
      *
-     * @param   s   the detail message.
+     * @param message the detail message.
      */
     public AttachOperationFailedException(String message) {
         super(message);
diff --git a/src/jdk.jdi/share/classes/com/sun/jdi/InterfaceType.java b/src/jdk.jdi/share/classes/com/sun/jdi/InterfaceType.java
--- a/src/jdk.jdi/share/classes/com/sun/jdi/InterfaceType.java
+++ b/src/jdk.jdi/share/classes/com/sun/jdi/InterfaceType.java
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@
      * not be done from the client's event handler thread.
      * <p>
      * The resumption of other threads during the invocation can be prevented
-     * by specifying the {@link #INVOKE_SINGLE_THREADED}
+     * by specifying the {@link ClassType#INVOKE_SINGLE_THREADED}
      * bit flag in the <code>options</code> argument; however,
      * there is no protection against or recovery from the deadlocks
      * described above, so this option should be used with great caution.