RFR: JDK-8068589: GCCause should distinguish jcmd GC.run from System.gc()
Yasumasa Suenaga
yasuenag at gmail.com
Tue Jan 27 12:22:36 UTC 2015
Hi Staffan,
Thank you for your comments.
I've uploaded new webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8068589/webrev.01/
I changed as below:
- GCCause::_jcmd_gc_run -> GCCause::_dcmd_gc_run
- GCCause string: "jcmd GC.run" -> "GC.run DCmd"
Could you review it?
Thanks,
Yasumasa
On 2015/01/26 17:12, Staffan Larsen wrote:
> A bit of terminology here. ‘GC.run’ is called a ‘Diagnostic Command’. ‘jcmd’ is one way to invoke a Diagnostic Command. Another way is via a JMX MBean. With this in mind I think your references to ‘jcmd’ should be changed to ‘diagnostic command’ (or an abbreviation thereof). For example: _jcmd_gc_run -> _dcmd_gc_run.
>
> Thanks,
> /Staffan
>
>> On 25 jan 2015, at 14:15, Yasumasa Suenaga <yasuenag at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> GCCause which is printed in gc log is "System.gc()" when jcmd GC.run is invoked.
>> I think that GCCause which is caused by jcmd GC.run should be different from System.gc() .
>>
>> I uploaded webrev for this enhancement:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8068589/webrev.00/
>>
>> This patch prints "jcmd GC.run" to gc log when jcmd GC.run is invoked.
>>
>>
>> Could you review it?
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Yasumasa
>
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list