RFR: 8074812 More specific error message when the .java_pid well-known file is not secure
Staffan Larsen
staffan.larsen at oracle.com
Wed Mar 11 09:30:48 UTC 2015
Thanks for the feedback. Here is a new version that prints out more details for each of the errors messages. Let me know if you have suggestions for better wording. It also adds an #include for jvm.h that was missing from some of the files (it is needed for jio_snprintf).
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sla/8074812/webrev.01/
/Staffan
> On 10 mar 2015, at 19:07, Martin Buchholz <martinrb at google.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Jaroslav Bachorik <jaroslav.bachorik at oracle.com <mailto:jaroslav.bachorik at oracle.com>> wrote:
>
> This just got me thinking - would including [sb.st_uid, uid] and [sb.st_gid, gid] in the error message be of any additional benefit?
>
> Yes. How much do you want to improve the quality of error messages?
>
> You could use the word "effective" only when effective and real users don't match.
> You could print out the two mismatched values.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/attachments/20150311/b91ff009/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list