[OpenJDK 2D-Dev] JDK-8081295: Build failed with GCC 5.1.1
Alexander Zvegintsev
alexander.zvegintsev at oracle.com
Thu May 28 13:00:20 UTC 2015
I think that you can just exclude libsplashscreen part from your fix,
since it is covered by JDK-8080695.
Thanks,
Alexander.
On 05/28/2015 02:52 PM, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
>
> Hi Alexander,
>
> Thank you for your comment.
>
> I agree to use DISABLED_WARNINGS_gcc.
>
> Should I make a patch afterJDK-8080695
> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8080695> committed?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Yasumasa
>
> 2015/05/28 18:19 "Alexander Zvegintsev"
> <alexander.zvegintsev at oracle.com
> <mailto:alexander.zvegintsev at oracle.com>>:
>
> Hello Yasumasa,
>
> I prefer to avoid such pragma usage, as for me code is more
> readable without it.
> So we can add array-bounds to DISABLED_WARNINGS_gcc in
> make/lib/Awt2dLibraries.gmk for BUILD_LIBJAVAJPEG and
> BUILD_LIBMLIB_IMAGE.
>
> We can nullify row_pointers and image_data after setjmp call to
> remove warnings in splashscreen_png.c:
> diff -r 729dffc8afa0
> src/java.desktop/share/native/libsplashscreen/splashscreen_png.c
> --- a/src/java.desktop/share/native/libsplashscreen/splashscreen_png.c
> +++ b/src/java.desktop/share/native/libsplashscreen/splashscreen_png.c
> @@ -77,6 +77,8 @@ SplashDecodePng(Splash * splash, png_rw_
> #else
> if (setjmp(png_jmpbuf(png_ptr))) {
> #endif
> + row_pointers = NULL;
> + image_data = NULL;
> goto done;
> }
> (or declare them as volatile, but I prefer the first option).
> BTW, there is another issue about this splashscreen_png.c gcc
> build failure [1].
>
> [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8080695
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alexander.
>
>
> On 05/28/2015 06:27 AM, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
>
> I've uploaded webrev:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8081295/webrev.01/
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eysuenaga/JDK-8081295/webrev.01/>
>
> Please review.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Yasumasa
>
>
> On 2015/05/28 12:19, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I tried to build jdk9/dev on Fedora22 with GCC 5.1.1,
> however, it was failed.
> I found several problems:
>
>
> System:
> Fedora release 22 (Twenty Two) x86_64
> - gcc-5.1.1-1.fc22.x86_64
>
>
> Problems:
> 1. Array bounds check in GCC
> -
> jdk/src/java.desktop/share/native/libjavajpeg/jcmaster.c
> -
> jdk/src/java.desktop/share/native/libjavajpeg/jquant1.c
> -
> jdk/src/java.desktop/share/native/libmlib_image/mlib_ImageLookUp_64.c
> -
> jdk/src/java.desktop/share/native/libmlib_image/mlib_c_ImageLookUp_f.c
>
> It seems to be bug of GCC:
> Bug 59124: [4.8/4.9/5/6 Regression] Wrong
> warnings "array subscript is above array bounds"
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59124
>
> I think implementations of these files have no problem.
> So I propose to ignore warning(s) of compiler
> through pragma option as
> workaround when we use GCC [1].
>
>
> 2. Local variables might be clobbered
> -
> jdk/src/java.desktop/share/native/libsplashscreen/splashscreen_png.c
>
> SplashDecodePng() calls setjmp(3).
> Some local variables initialize before setjmp()
> call, and use after it.
> Their initial values are only used at cleanup code
> (*done* label) and
> actual values are stored only after setjmp() call.
> So I think we can ignore this error through pragma
> option [1].
>
>
> 3. Incorrect condition
> -
> jdk/src/jdk.jdwp.agent/share/native/libjdwp/eventFilter.c
>
> searchAllSourceNames() returns int value. However,
> branch condition in
> eventFilterRestricted_passesFilter() treats it as
> boolean value.
>
>
> I received a comment from Erik to use
> --disable-warnings-as-errors,
> however I could not avoid error in 3.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Yasumasa
>
>
> [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Diagnostic-Pragmas.html
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/attachments/20150528/6560fe26/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list