RFR: 8143121: javax/management/remote/mandatory/loading/MethodResultTest.java fails intermittently
Daniel Fuchs
daniel.fuchs at oracle.com
Tue Nov 24 13:57:06 UTC 2015
Hi Alexander,
That still look good to me - I would maybe go for 100ms rather
than 10ms. Have you tried to run the test in the same
conditions/platform where the test was observed failing?
best regards,
-- daniel
On 24/11/15 13:58, Alexander Kulyakhtin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Following the finding from Martin, I have changed the delay before the
> retry to 10 ms
>
> Webrev:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~akulyakh/8143121_03/test/javax/management/remote/mandatory/loading/MethodResultTest.java.udiff.html
>
> Best regards,
> Alexander
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: martinrb at google.com
> To: alexander.kulyakhtin at oracle.com
> Cc: daniel.fuchs at oracle.com, serviceability-dev at openjdk.java.net
> Sent: Monday, November 23, 2015 9:15:20 PM GMT +03:00 Iraq
> Subject: Re: RFR: 8143121:
> javax/management/remote/mandatory/loading/MethodResultTest.java fails
> intermittently
>
> 3 seconds sounds like an awfully long time between retries. I'd guess
> that 10ms would be sufficient most of the time for other threads to get
> around to doing something, and 100ms for other Java processes.
>
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 7:00 AM, Alexander Kulyakhtin
> <alexander.kulyakhtin at oracle.com
> <mailto:alexander.kulyakhtin at oracle.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Thank you very much for your feedback.
>
> I have posted to the group an updated webrev introducing a 3 sec
> sleep before the next retry.
>
> Webrev:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~akulyakh/8143121_02/test/javax/management/remote/mandatory/loading/MethodResultTest.java.udiff.html
>
> Best regards,
> Alexander
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: daniel.fuchs at oracle.com <mailto:daniel.fuchs at oracle.com>
> To: alexander.kulyakhtin at oracle.com
> <mailto:alexander.kulyakhtin at oracle.com>
> Cc: serviceability-dev at openjdk.java.net
> <mailto:serviceability-dev at openjdk.java.net>
> Sent: Monday, November 23, 2015 5:51:28 PM GMT +03:00 Iraq
> Subject: Re: RFR: 8143121:
> javax/management/remote/mandatory/loading/MethodResultTest.java
> fails intermittently
>
> Hi Alexander,
>
> On 23/11/15 13:09, Alexander Kulyakhtin wrote:
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > Thank you very much for the review.
> >
> > I presumed that in such case the jtreg will terminate the test by
> timeout and so I wanted to avoid any specific delays and counters.
> > If it's not safe to presume that, then I'm going to limit the
> number of retries to 5 times introducing a delay of 3 seconds
> between the reties, or I can use any other values if there are more
> preferable values.
>
> I agree that it's usually better to avoid to handcraft
> arbitrary timeouts in tests. These have a habit of
> coming back and bite you ;-(
>
> If the reason for the connection failure is a race
> condition where the server side is not ready yet, then
> forcing the client side to sleep will hopefully
> make some room for the server side to come up.
>
> What I'm most concerned here is avoiding the busy loop,
> as the busy loop could make things worse (rather than
> helping).
>
> So your proposed changes sound good - and Shanliang's
> too - provided you free up some CPU time for the other
> (possibly daemon) threads to complete their work.
>
> best regards,
>
> -- daniel
>
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Alexander
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: daniel.fuchs at oracle.com <mailto:daniel.fuchs at oracle.com>
> > To: alexander.kulyakhtin at oracle.com
> <mailto:alexander.kulyakhtin at oracle.com>,
> serviceability-dev at openjdk.java.net
> <mailto:serviceability-dev at openjdk.java.net>
> > Sent: Monday, November 23, 2015 2:32:27 PM GMT +03:00 Iraq
> > Subject: Re: RFR: 8143121:
> javax/management/remote/mandatory/loading/MethodResultTest.java
> fails intermittently
> >
> > Hi Alexander,
> >
> > This looks a bit dangerous to me - it could create a busy loop
> > if for some reason the connection can never go through.
> >
> > I would suggest retrying only once (or retrying a fixed number
> > of times) - and possibly introducing a small delay (Thread.sleep)
> > before retrying.
> >
> > best regards,
> >
> > -- daniel
> >
> > On 23/11/15 12:19, Alexander Kulyakhtin wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Could you, please, review this small, test-only, change:
> >>
> >> CR: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8143121
> >> Webrev:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~akulyakh/8143121/test/javax/management/remote/mandatory/loading/MethodResultTest.java.udiff.html
> >>
> >> The precondition for this test is a JMXConnector having
> established a successful connection.
> >> On some environments the test sometimes can not connect at the
> first attempt, because the target application is not yet ready.
> >> We are changing the test so that it tries to connect again if it
> gets IOException during the connection.
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >> Alexander
> >>
> >
>
>
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list