RFR[9u-dev]: 8153319: new test serviceability/tmtools/jstack/JstackThreadTest.java fails
Daniel D. Daugherty
daniel.daugherty at oracle.com
Thu Apr 7 14:22:27 UTC 2016
Cheleswer,
When you re-sync with the current JDK9-hs-rt, you'll have to
re-enable this test. It was quarantined yesterday with this fix:
JDK-8153671 Quarantine serviceability/tmtools/jstack/JstackThreadTest.java
until JDK-8153319 is fixed
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8153671
You just need to remove the @ignore line.
Dan
On 4/7/16 8:12 AM, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
> Cheleswer,
>
> Looks good for me. Reviewed.
>
> -Dmitry
>
> On 2016-04-07 16:50, Cheleswer Sahu wrote:
>> Hi ,
>> Thanks for your review and suggestion. I agree that sleep is not the best and reliable way to achieve the objective of test case. I also found the idea of using j.u.c.CountDownLatch very easy and effective. I have made some changes in the code. Please review the code changes in the below link
>>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~csahu/8153319/webrev.01/
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Cheleswer
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Leonid Mesnik
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2016 7:00 PM
>> To: Cheleswer Sahu; hotspot-runtime-dev at openjdk.java.net; serviceability-dev at openjdk.java.net
>> Subject: Re: RFR[9u-dev]: 8153319: new test serviceability/tmtools/jstack/JstackThreadTest.java fails
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> I don't think that sleep is a good way to ensure that thread is started.
>> It is not reliable on the slow host / VM under stress and just waste of time on fast host.
>> Is it possible just to add any explicit synchronization to ensure that NamedThread is started?
>>
>> Leonid
>>
>> On 05.04.2016 13:23, Cheleswer Sahu wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Please review the code changes for https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8153319.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Webrev link: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~csahu/8153319/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Bug Brief: Test is failing on some platforms.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Problem Identified: Newly created child thread (NamedThread) is finished its execution before main thread calls "jstack", which result in test failure.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Solution Proposed: Set the child thread in sleep state for forever and make sure that "jstack " tool always gets executed after " NamedThread" is started.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Cheleswer
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list