RFR(XS) 8155727: java/util/concurrent/locks/Lock/TimedAcquireLeak.java timeouts.
Martin Buchholz
martinrb at google.com
Fri Apr 29 19:39:22 UTC 2016
Thanks, looks good.
(In future, please notify code owners using the relevant mailing
lists, in this case core-libs-dev)
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 12:32 PM, harold seigel
<harold.seigel at oracle.com> wrote:
> Please review this updated webrev that uses Martin's fix:
>
> New webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~hseigel/bug_8155727.1/
>
> Thanks, Harold
>
>
> On 4/29/2016 3:19 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
>>
>> Apologies for taking over here ... This test is maintained externally
>> in JSR166 CVS. We prefer a version that works well with both old and
>> new outputs. I suggest instead
>>
>> "(?m)^ *[0-9]+: +([0-9]+) +[0-9]+ +\\Q"+className+"\\E(?:$| )";
>>
>> Does that work with latest serviceability changes?
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 11:00 AM, harold seigel
>> <harold.seigel at oracle.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Please review this extra small fix for test TimedAcquireLeak.java. The
>>> test
>>> was broken by the recent change to add module information to the JMAP
>>> class
>>> histogram. This fixes the test's regular expression to handle the
>>> possible
>>> additional module information.
>>>
>>> Open webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~hseigel/bug_8155727/
>>>
>>> JBS bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8155727
>>>
>>> Thanks! Harold
>>>
>
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list