RFR: JDK-8163185: jhsdb jstack cannot work with normal mode

Yasumasa Suenaga yasuenag at gmail.com
Fri Aug 5 10:55:02 UTC 2016


Hi David,

Thank you for your comment.

For not to break current behavior, I think we should not change c'tor of JStack.
I uploaded new webrev:

   http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8163185/webrev.01/

David, is it okay?
Dmitry, could you review again?


Thanks,

Yasumasa


On 2016/08/05 14:49, David Holmes wrote:
> On 5/08/2016 12:24 AM, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This review request is related to [1].
>>
>> "jhsdb jstack" should work as normal mode without being added --mixed
>> option.
>> However, this command always works as mixed mode.
>
> So it seems to me the JStack class has a very poorly designed API and command-line interface. It appears that jstack wants to default to mixedMode and concurrentLocks, but provides no means to disable those defaults. Given there is no way to turn those settings off from the commad-line then the default should be that they are off! Then you would not need current proposed change.
>
> That said the proposed fix effectively disables those defaults, which seems to me to be a change in behaviour.
>
> I can't see a way to fix this without breaking existing behaviour somewhere. In which case I would change the way the JStack instance is initialized by default ie:
>
> public JStack() {
>     this(true, true);
> }
>
> becomes:
>
> public JStack() {
>     this(false, false);
> }
>
> Or it may be better to handle this on the jhsdb side and change this:
>
>        JStack.main(newArgs.toArray(new String[newArgs.size()]));
> to
>
>        JStack js = new jstack(false,false);
>        js.runWithArgs(newArgs.toArray(new String[newArgs.size()]));
>
>
> Cheers,
> David
>
>> So I uploaded webrev for this issue. Could you review it?
>>
>>   http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8163185/webrev.00/
>>
>>
>> I'm jdk 9 reviewer (ysuenaga), but I cannot access JPRT.
>> So I need a sponsor.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Yasumasa
>>
>>
>> [1]
>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/2016-August/020087.html
>>


More information about the serviceability-dev mailing list