PING : RFR : JDK-8066635 - Fix deprecation warnings in java.management module

Amit Sapre amit.sapre at oracle.com
Tue Aug 30 10:39:08 UTC 2016


Hello,
Fixed the alignment problem as well. Here is the updated webrev.

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jgeorge/sponsorships/8066635/webrev.02/ 

Thanks,
Amit


-----Original Message-----
From: David Holmes 
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2016 11:44 AM
To: Amit Sapre; serviceability-dev
Subject: Re: PING : RFR : JDK-8066635 - Fix deprecation warnings in java.management module

On 30/08/2016 3:56 PM, Amit Sapre wrote:
> Thanks David for your inputs.
> I like to go the cleanup way and made changes accordingly.
> The new webrev is 
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jgeorge/sponsorships/8066635/webrev.01/

Looks good! Only nit is the argument alignment here:

!     default public ObjectInputStream deserialize(String className,
                                            ObjectName loaderName,
                                            byte[] data)

they should align with each other, after the (

Thanks,
David

> Thanks,
> Amit
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Holmes
> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 12:24 PM
> To: Amit Sapre; serviceability-dev
> Subject: Re: PING : RFR : JDK-8066635 - Fix deprecation warnings in 
> java.management module
>
> Hi Amit,
>
> On 24/08/2016 4:37 PM, Amit Sapre wrote:
>>
>> *From:*Amit Sapre
>> *Sent:* Monday, August 22, 2016 2:39 PM
>> *To:* serviceability-dev
>> *Subject:* RFR : JDK-8066635 - Fix deprecation warnings in 
>> java.management module
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Please review changes for fixing deprecation warnings.
>>
>> Bug ID : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8066635
>>
>> Webrev :
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sballal/sponsorship/8066635/webrev.00/
>
> Marking the methods @Deprecated fixes the problem.
>
> Another option would be converting the interface methods to default methods that throw the UnsupportOperationException and then delete them from the DefaultMBeanServerInterceptor class.
>
> Your call. If you leave as-is then consider this Reviewed.
>
> Thanks,
> David
>
>>
>>
>> Amit
>>


More information about the serviceability-dev mailing list