[ding] Re: jmx-dev [pong] Re: [ping] Re: RFR 8146015: JMXInterfaceBindingTest is failing intermittently for IPv6 addresses

Jaroslav Bachorik jaroslav.bachorik at oracle.com
Tue Jan 12 11:49:08 UTC 2016


On 12.1.2016 11:47, serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com wrote:
> On 1/7/16 08:40, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This looks OK to me.
>> I'm not sure I understand the full impact of the changes
>> in getAddressesForLocalHost() though - so hopefully someone
>> else will jump in to review that part...
>
> Hi Jaroslav,
>
> I do not understand the full impact of the getAddressesForLocalHost()
> change either
> so that, please, do not count me as a reviewer.

Looks like

>
> However, I have a question on the fragment:
>
> + private static boolean isLocalhost(InetAddress i) {
> + if (!i.isLoopbackAddress()) {
> + return i.getHostName().toLowerCase().equals("localhost");
> + }
> + return false;
>       }
>
>
> Should true be returned instead of false if the i.isLoopbackAddress()
> returns true?
> Do we normally treat the loopbackAddress case as a localhost variant?

Ok, maybe the method name is missing a bit - the idea is to get all 
'true' localhosts - a localhost defined on a real non-loopback adapter 
(as it doesn't make sense to bind JMX remote connector to a loopback 
address).

I just couldn't come up with more describing name not being excessively 
long :( I'm open to any suggestions.

-JB-

>
> Thanks,
> Serguei
>
>
>>
>> best regards,
>>
>> -- daniel
>>
>> On 07/01/16 16:02, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
>>> On 5.1.2016 15:30, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
>>>> On 4.1.2016 10:05, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
>>>>> Gentle reminder ...
>>>>>
>>>>> On 23.12.2015 11:26, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
>>>>>> Please, review the following test change
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Issue : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8146015
>>>>>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jbachorik/8146015/webrev.00
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The test fails for IPv6 addresses since the RMI expects an IPv6
>>>>>> address
>>>>>> to be properly wrapped in '[]'. In addition to that the logic for
>>>>>> selecting IP addresses to bind is flawed - it does not check for IP
>>>>>> addresses of multiple adapters but for multiple IP addresses
>>>>>> assigned to
>>>>>> 'localhost'. In combination with IPv4 & IPv6 this will cause the
>>>>>> test to
>>>>>> attempt binding to IPv4 and IPv6 address of the same adapter
>>>>>> simultaneously and the test will fail.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The fix adds the requested wrapping for IPv6 addresses and adjusts
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> IP selection logic to iterate over distinct adapters first and
>>>>>> prevent
>>>>>> IPv4 and IPv6 address of the same adapter being treated as two
>>>>>> addresses
>>>>>> (for the purposes of the test).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -JB-
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>



More information about the serviceability-dev mailing list