RFR[9u-dev] 8130425: libjvm crash due to stack overflow in executables with 32k tbss/tdata

Martin Buchholz martinrb at google.com
Wed Jan 13 18:54:26 UTC 2016


You should include core-libs-dev (and perhaps hotspot-runtime-dev) in
this thread.  You're changing core library code.

On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 2:25 AM, cheleswer sahu
<cheleswer.sahu at oracle.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please review the code changes for
> "https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8130425".
>
> Problem summary: When a large TLS (Thread Local Storage) size is set for
> threads,  JVM is throwing StackOverflow exception.
>
> Problem Identified:
> As per investigation and a discussion we came to the conclusion that issue
> is not with the JVM but it lies in the way glibc has been implemented. When
> a TLS is declared , it steals the space from threads stack size.
> So if a thread is created with small stack size, and TLS is set to a large
> value, then it will result in StackOverflow. This is the exact case in this
> bug where reaper thread is allocated a very low stack size 32768.
>
> Discussion thread:
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2015-December/037558.html
>
> Solution proposed:
> Its expected to get fix in glibc sometime , but for now I propose a
> workaround, a boolean system property "processReaperUseDefaultStackSize"
> using which we can set the stack size for reaper thread to default
> instead of fix 32768. This property can be set by the user using "-D" or
> "System.setProperty()". I have tested this fix, it works well with TLS size
> between 32k to 128k.
>
> Fix:
> diff -r 5c4530bb9ae6
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/ProcessHandleImpl.jav
> --- a/src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/ProcessHandleImpl.java Fri Jan
> 08 13:06:29 2016 +0800
> +++ b/src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/ProcessHandleImpl.java Tue Jan
> 12 15:55:50 2016 +0530
> @@ -83,9 +83,13 @@
>                  ThreadGroup systemThreadGroup = tg;
>
>                  ThreadFactory threadFactory = grimReaper -> {
> -                    // Our thread stack requirement is quite modest.
> -                    Thread t = new Thread(systemThreadGroup, grimReaper,
> -                            "process reaper", 32768);
> +                   Thread t = null;
> +                   if
> (Boolean.getBoolean("processReaperUseDefaultStackSize")) {
> +                       t = new Thread(systemThreadGroup, grimReaper,
> "process reaper");
> +                    } else {
> +                       // Our thread stack requirement is quite modest.
> +                       t = new Thread(systemThreadGroup, grimReaper,
> "process reaper", 32768);
> +                    }
>                      t.setDaemon(true);
>                      // A small attempt (probably futile) to avoid priority
> inversion
>                      t.setPriority(Thread.MAX_PRIORITY);
>
>
> Regards,
> Cheleswer


More information about the serviceability-dev mailing list