[PATCH] 6822627: NPE at ReferenceTypeImpl.constantPool
serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com
serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com
Fri Jul 15 09:22:26 UTC 2016
Hi Egor,
The fix looks good modulo the synchronization issue.
Do you have a jtreg unit test reproducing this failure mode?
We have a rule to provide a test coverage for the fixes.
Thanks,
Serguei
On 7/15/16 00:03, Egor Ushakov wrote:
>
> Thanks for your comments!
>
> I totally agree that the code there requires major refactoring. In the
> fix I tried not to make it worse and fix the NPE.
>
>
> On 14.07.2016 20:06, Martin Buchholz wrote:
>> The lack of volatile or synchronization, plus the use of multiple
>> mutable fields, suggests that a deeper fix is necessary to be truly
>> correct. For comparison, much of the similar code implementing
>> reflection has been changed to use volatile. But that's a big job,
>> for the serviceability team.
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 2:33 AM, Egor Ushakov
>> <egor.ushakov at jetbrains.com <mailto:egor.ushakov at jetbrains.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm a developer from IDEA debugger (we have company OCA).
>> We've increased usage of ReferenceTypeImpl.constantPool and now
>> facing
>> JDK-6822627 more often.
>> Please review and sponsor the fix.
>>
>> The problem was that constantPoolBytesRef SoftReference value coud be
>> GCed and there was no check for that.
>> I've added it to the check inside getConstantPoolInfo to request the
>> bytes again in this case.
>>
>> BUGURL: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6822627
>> WEBREV: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avu/JDK-6822627/webrev.00/
>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eavu/JDK-6822627/webrev.00/>
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> --
>> Egor Ushakov
>> Software Developer
>> JetBrains
>> http://www.jetbrains.com
>> The Drive to Develop
>>
>>
>
> --
> Egor Ushakov
> Software Developer
> JetBrains
> http://www.jetbrains.com
> The Drive to Develop
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/attachments/20160715/2deaa67c/attachment.html>
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list