RFR:8153978:New test to verify the modules info as returned by the JVMTI

[serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com]

Hi Alexander,

I'm curious if the jtreg 4.2 is out and this test can be pushed now?
I'd want to use the same pattern to write the Jigsaw related JVMTI tests.

Thanks,
Serguei


On 5/5/16 04:25, Alexander Kulyakhtin wrote:
> Sergey,
>
> Thank you very much for the review.
> I will be pushing the fix as soon as jtreg 4.2 is out, since 4.2  has 
> the fix for CODETOOLS-7901662, required for this test.
>
> Best regards,
> Alexander
>
> From: serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com
> To: alexander.kulyakhtin at oracle.com
> Cc: serviceability-dev at openjdk.java.net, aleksey.voytilov at oracle.com
> Sent: Wednesday, May 4, 2016 11:31:07 PM GMT +03:00 Iraq
> Subject: Re: RFR:8153978:New test to verify the modules info as 
> returned by the JVMTI
>
> Hi Alexander,
>
> It looks good.
> Thank you for making the changes!
>
> Thanks,
> Serguei
>
>
>
> On 5/4/16 05:17, Alexander Kulyakhtin wrote:
>
>     Hi Sergey,
>
>     Thank you very much for the review.
>
>     Please, find the updated webrev with your findings corrected at:
>     http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~akulyakh/8153978_02/index.html
>
>     Best regards,
>     Alexander
>
>     ----- Original Message -----
>     From: serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com
>     To: alexander.kulyakhtin at oracle.com,
>     serviceability-dev at openjdk.java.net
>     Cc: aleksey.voytilov at oracle.com
>     Sent: Tuesday, May 3, 2016 1:06:05 AM GMT +03:00 Iraq
>     Subject: Re: RFR:8153978:New test to verify the modules info as
>     returned by the JVMTI
>
>     Hi Alexander,
>
>
>     Could you, fix a couple of minor issues?
>
>     test/serviceability/jvmti/GetModulesInfo/JvmtiGetAllModulesTest.java
>
>        58         for(Module mod : my.modules()) {
>        59             if(!jvmtiModules.contains(mod)) {
>
>        A space is missed after the 'for' and 'if' keywords.
>
>
>     test/serviceability/jvmti/GetModulesInfo/ModulesInfo.java.
>
>        31     boolean compareExcludingUnnamed(ModulesInfo other) {
>
>        I'd suggest to call it compareNamed.
>
>
>     Otherwise, the new test looks great.
>     Thanks a lot for taking care about it!
>
>     Thanks,
>     Serguei
>
>
>
>     On 4/29/16 06:12, Alexander Kulyakhtin wrote:
>
>         Hi,
>
>         Could you, please, review these test-only changes (adding a new test).
>
>         CR:https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8153978  "New test to verify the modules info as returned by the JVMTI"
>         Webrev:http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~akulyakh/8153978_01/
>
>         The new test verifies that JVMTI returns the correct info about the modules loaded at the application startup.
>         It also verifies that the returned info is consistent with the same info returned by the Java API.
>         It then loads a new named module and checks the correctness of the JVMTI info again.
>
>         Due to a tools issuehttps://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/CODETOOLS-7901662  the test can only be pushed in when the updated jtreg is released.
>         The test passes fine with the nightly jtreg build, containing the CODETOOLS-7901662 fix.
>
>         Best regards,
>         Alexander
>
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/attachments/20160617/e3a909e5/attachment-0001.html>